Search for: "State v. Save" Results 6901 - 6920 of 11,764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 3:52 pm by Rick
I’m talking about the latest case from the United States Supreme Court — Florence v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
  In fact, Richard could’ve saved himself some trouble by calling me. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:35 am by Nassiri Law
For the state of California, the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) conducted a survey of 5,500 households within the state to determine the statewide unemployment rate for the month. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 10:19 am by The Law Office of Gali Schaham Gordon
Save Our Small and Seasonal Businesses Act of 2011 (H.R. 3718) – prioritizes certain returning workers for purposes of the quotas on H-2B non-agricultural temporary workers. 10. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” Without this coverage, parents would be able to choose to save money while endangering public health and their children. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” Without this coverage, parents would be able to choose to save money while endangering public health and their children. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 7:33 am by Abbe R. Gluck
” The court used the doctrine to save two statutes this term after finding provisions of each unconstitutional: It saved the CFPB provisions of the Dodd Frank Act in Seila Law, and it saved the federal anti-robocall provisions of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act in Barr v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 5:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
She asks why Alicia was given her tax case (he replies, "to 'save her ass'").Back in court, representative for state is questioned about delayed response time to suicide calls -- they wait until potential suicide victim is on ledge, ready to jump. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by Bryn Hines
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 1:39 pm
Monitoring the Government's Response to Human Rights Judgments: Annual Report 2008"Prisoners' voting rights (Hirst v UK)47. [read post]