Search for: "mark"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 135,997
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2014, 6:43 pm
There’s even rumors that Twain’s story A Connecticut Yankee In King Arthur’s Court, an early sci-fi classic, based its main character around Tesla.link: http://www.itsokaytobesmart.com/post/14226144523/nikola-tesla-and-samuel-clemens-mark-twain-had And recall November 30th is the birthday of Mark Twain.See Did Nikola Tesla Play a Practical Joke on Mark Twain’s Birthday? [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 5:44 am
The Board reversed a Section 2(a) refusal of the mark shown below for travel agency services, rejecting the USPTO's contention that the mark includes matter that falsely suggests an association with Disney Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:29 am
Applicant pointed to two co-existing registrations for marks containing the phrases "MOTHER'S TOUCH" and "WOMAN'S TOUCH" for dentistry services as proof that its mark can co-exist with the cited mark. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 6:09 am
Moreover, the Greek Supreme Administrative Court concluded that the enhanced distinctive character of the earlier mark was also not taken into consideration by the appellate court.The judgment practically seems to point to a conclusion of confusing similarity between the marks. [read post]
22 Nov 2024, 4:07 am
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the mark ENDURELITE, finding confusion likely with the registered mark ENDUROLETE, both for dietary and nutritional supplements. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 4:53 am
As to analog and digital audio signal transmitters, the Board first concluded that a series of undated documents showing some transmitters bearing the mark and others not bearing the mark lacked probative value. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:15 am
That left genericness, and the Board found that the mark as a whole is not generic. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:09 am
Do we really want the PTO to reject marks that are "disgraceful"? [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 3:15 am
Since Section 23 prohibits registration of inherently distinctive marks on the Supplemental Register, this was an admission by applicant (at the time of registration) that the mark was not distinctive.And so the Board concluded that the applied-for mark is primarily merely a surname under Section 2(e)(4).Applicant claimed, alternatively, that the mark had acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 9:52 pm
For example, a canny marketer could use the DOVE trade mark in relation to unrelated goods, say cars (avoiding confusion), but still take advantage of the cause ("real beauty") now represented by trade mark, and hence the advertising goodwill in the mark. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 3:47 am
The combination of the two words does not significantly impact the overall impression of the mark, "although ZINFANDEL does make Applicant's mark look and sound more similar to Registrant's mark. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:39 pm
“Marks was summarily forced out of office by Gov. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 3:28 am
"Opposer Barnard claimed that he started using the MANDALA mark in 2019. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 10:00 pm
” The applicants notably include Fox Media, who wishes to use the mark for a television series. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:08 am
The marks cited by applicant were either unitary marks in which disclaimer of "super" would not be required, or, for registrations issuing after Phillips-Van Heusen, comprised the word "Super" followed by a suggestive term (e.g., SUPER STRAP, SUPER BRITE, SUPER EDGE). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:56 am
" Moreover, the word INDESTRUCTIBLE is not disclaimed in the cited mark. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 3:50 am
The registrant here has as yet no proprietary rights in a mark …. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 3:21 am
But what about the marks? [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 3:27 am
The USPTO refused to register the mark AMERICAN BARRISTER for legal services, deeming the mark to be merely descriptive under Section 2(e)(1) and primarily geographically descriptive under Section 2(e)(2). [read post]
5 May 2017, 3:51 am
The Board found the marks to be substantially similar, since HAPPY HOUND is the dominant element in the cited mark. [read post]