Search for: "Doe v. ATTORNEY"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 36,060
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2008, 2:58 pm
Schwab does not insist on the presentation of oral argument. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 12:54 pm
Virginia; Hoover v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Does 1–3 v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 2:29 pm
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY – BI-ECONOMY – CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES – ATTORNEY'S FEES – DISCOVERY – ATTORNEY-CLIENT AND ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT PRIVILEGES – APPRAISAL De Martino v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:23 am
In June, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor attracted attention for her dissent in Utah v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:06 am
Muldrow v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:22 pm
Neither Peters nor the three Copyright Office attorneys at the three-hour hearing here tipped their hats on whether they would recommend the librarian of Congress to grant the exemption, a decision expected later this year. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
And on November 4, 2015, the Court heard oral arguments from attorneys for HealthSource and Mr. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:00 am
Georgia Courts continue to recognize this evidentiary burden as seen most recently in Custer v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
Andrews v. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 9:44 pm
KSR v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 11:42 am
The matter of Rubin v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 pm
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court recently decided State of Maine v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 11:50 am
Rowland Trucking Company, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:39 pm
By Daniel RichardsonColes v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:23 am
You don't see that kind of praise from the Ninth Circuit often, and lemme tell you, for a shot at those types of kind words immortalized forever, I bet a lot of attorneys would be more than willing to take on pro bono assignments from the Ninth Circuit in the future. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:39 pm
The Court of Appeal for Ontario has recently adopted a similar approach in Restoule v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:25 am
In Koussa v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
" Further, said the court, an attorney who advises a client to take an action that he or she, in good faith, believes to be legal, does not lose the protection of the First Amendment if his or her advice is later determined to be incorrect.The Appellate Division granted the appeal, prohibiting the Suffolk County District Attorney, Thomas J. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:50 am
To the extent that plaintiff bases her legal malpractice claim on rule 1.4(a)(1)(iii) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, an allegation of legal malpractice based on a violation of the disciplinary rules does not, without other allegations supporting the cause of action[*2], support a malpractice claim (Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
