Search for: "Figures v. Figures" Results 6921 - 6940 of 15,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2007, 9:22 am
  Rather than attempting to figure out the briefs on my own, I'd like to tap into the collective wisdom of the readers of this blog. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 6:20 am
Even though Albritton was not a public figure, he ruled, the “actual malice” standard adopted by the Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:47 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Zoologist József Vágvölgyi discovered George in 1971 and brought him into captivity. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 3:24 pm
The case concerns a "descriptive" trademark, which "picks out a product characteristic that figures prominently in the consumer's decision whether to buy the product or service in question. [read post]
2 May 2012, 9:36 am
For a detailed discussion of the relationship between Involuntary Manslaughter and Motor Vehicle Homicide read Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 5:38 pm
Doug Powell's BarfBlog Defense Invokes Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:00 am by lawshucks
And we won't solicit others to figure out who you are, either, which seems like a bit of bad form by the Times. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 4:11 am
With the recent emergence of high profile cases such as Nokia v iPhone, this could see patent cases in the mobile phone industry for some time to come. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 7:57 am
Board of Education (1948): "A rule of law should not be drawn from a figure of speech. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 8:23 am by Mark Terry
This is good news for patent holders who figured that injunctive relief was no longer a realistic option after the eBay decision. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 12:02 am by Laurent Teyssèdre
La Chambre est consciente que des arguments figurant dans des observations de tiers anonymes peuvent être repris par une partie ou même par l'OEB. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:14 am by Jamie Garside and Siobhan Hayes
The case in question was Balkhi v Southern Land Securities Ltd and clearly the Upper Tribunal were unhappy with the quality of the evidence they had to analyse. [read post]