Search for: "Office of Hearing and Appeals" Results 6921 - 6940 of 23,875
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2011, 12:34 am by Bystander
The same language in front of experienced police officers is not.Nobody is trying to make the job of the police any harder, but the only law that matters is the law as it stands. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 2:59 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Specifically, the state wanted to prevent the jury from hearing that the officer who initiated the traffic stop had previously been disciplined for engaging in a vehicle pursuit. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 9:20 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
Earlier this month, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals heard an appeal from a slip-and-fall case that arose out of the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:35 am by Stephen M. Fuerch
The jury hearing the case concluded that Hernandez was negligent but that his negligence did not cause David’s and Pierson’s injuries. [read post]
19 May 2024, 4:01 am by Administrator
The S.C.C. allowed the appeal in part. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 1:15 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit Thursday. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 7:08 am by Joy
Wise, TorontoVisit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net Visit our website: www.wiselaw.net [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 3:17 pm by Claire Mitchell
The rule also sets the procedures and time frames for appeals of OSHA determinations to an administrate law judge (ALJ) for a hearing de novo, hearings by ALJs, review of ALJ decisions by the Administrative Review Board (ARB) (acting on behalf of the Secretary of Labor), and judicial review of the Secretary’s final decision. [read post]
7 May 2018, 6:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ultimately the Hearing Officer, finding Coleman guilty of some of the charges and dismissing others, suspended Coleman from "from all teaching duties without pay" but directed Dundee to continue paying employer contributions for Coleman's health insurance premiums during the period of his suspension without pay.Typically an employee participating in an employer's health insurance plan who is removed from the payroll for a period of absence "without… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 5:59 am
Part-time municipal judge Vince Sicari appeals to the Supreme Court of New Jersey to overturn the decision of the state ethics committee, which found an ethics violation. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Safir, 291 AD2d 298, leave to appeal denied, 98 NY2d 61 [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The detectives had contended that assigning detectives to patrol duty on a limited basis violated Civil Service Law §§58 and 75 by forcing them to perform work "beneath their rank and title" without a hearing,” appealed the Supreme Court's decision. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The IPCC arrested a former Scotland Yard officer last Tuesday: former Scotland Yard officer DCS Dave Cook. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 2:48 am by Jon Gelman
Accordingly we remand for a further hearing consistent with this opinion.Remanded.N.J.Super.A.D.,2014.Planes v. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 7:40 am by John H Curley
Furthermore, respondent has shown the hearing officer's award has a rational basis. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The original substantiated finding was sustained by the Justice Center's Administrative Appeals Unit and the matter was referred for a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge [ALJ].The ALJ conducted two hearings and issued a recommended decision finding that Justice had established by a preponderance of the evidence that Petitioner was guilty of the alleged adverse conduct involving the Service Recipient. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The original substantiated finding was sustained by the Justice Center's Administrative Appeals Unit and the matter was referred for a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge [ALJ].The ALJ conducted two hearings and issued a recommended decision finding that Justice had established by a preponderance of the evidence that Petitioner was guilty of the alleged adverse conduct involving the Service Recipient. [read post]