Search for: "Samuels" Results 6921 - 6940 of 14,804
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2016, 9:01 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Justice Elena Kagan wrote for the court, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Samuel Alito. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 8:48 am by Steven W. Seymour
"The post The Old Bailey: A Sabbatical in England appeared first on Samuels Yoelin Kantor LLP.. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 7:22 am by Jon Ibanez
Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito said that breath tests do not implicate “significant privacy concerns. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 9:04 pm by Walter Olson
I quote Samuel Johnson’s famous definition of excise in my new Philadelphia Inquirer op-ed on the city’s recently enacted soda levy. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:03 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Samuel Moyn gave us a comprehensive rundown of Mark Danner’s latest book, Spiral: Trapped in the Forever War. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 2:13 pm by John Paul Schnapper-Casteras
Nor did Kennedy, in his clear-cut, twenty-page opinion, feel much need to respond to Justice Samuel Alito’s vehement, fifty-one-page dissent. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
In dissent, Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, protested that “whether petitioner is entitled to relief on this [second-step] ground has nothing to do with Foster,” since Foster addressed only Batson’s third step. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:47 am by Kimberly West-Faulcon
This means Justice Samuel Alito is absolutely correct in declaring in the first line of his fifty-one-page dissent that “[s]omething strange has happened since our prior decision in this case. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:28 am by Amanda Frost
   Justices Anthony Kennedy and Samuel Alito also jumped into the fray, making the same point. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 6:10 pm by Richard Kahlenberg
As Justice Samuel Alito noted in dissent, “Something strange has happened since our prior decision in this case. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:05 pm by Ilya Somin
As Justice Samuel Alito points out in his dissent: These are laudable goals, but they are not concrete or precise, and they offer no limiting principle for the use of racial preferences. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:34 pm by tjsllibrary
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote his own dissent and Chief Justice John Roberts joined Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm by Stuart Taylor
Justice Samuel Alito, in a fifty-one-page dissent that he summarized from the bench, said more candidly that the decision amounted to “blind deference” to the “[c]onsideration of race [that] pervades every aspect of UT’s admissions process. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:14 pm by David Gans
”   In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Samuel Alito castigated the University’s policy as “affirmative action gone wild” and accused the majority of abandoning strict scrutiny. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 12:49 pm by Amy Howe
In an opinion by Justice Samuel Alito, the Court began by noting the dilemma in which states had found themselves. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 11:08 am by Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia
Shoba Sivaprasad Wadhia is the Samuel Weiss Faculty Scholar and founding director of the Center for Immigrants’ Rights Clinic at Penn State Law- University Park. [read post]