Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 6921 - 6940
of 29,473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 5:01 am
[More on Doe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm
And Article 24 required Member States for provide for sanctions for breach of implementing legislation. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:09 pm
Indeed, I think Texas v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:29 am
In 1985, the Supreme Court decided that a police officer's use of a level of force that the Court deemed excessive--despite being authorized by state law and consistent with a rule going back to the common law and widely adopted by the states--was an "unreasonable seizure" in violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:04 am
R. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:01 am
An impeachment conviction does not result in a prison sentence, and the level of certainty required is rightly something less. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 3:30 am
So, your mileage may vary at the state or local level. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
But from definitions of income to exemptions to net operating losses, and even what filing statuses are available and whether a taxpayer can itemize their deductions, the federal tax code consistently informs state-level taxation. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 11:16 pm
In Murphy v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:56 pm
Whatever the Walter Nixon v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 1:09 pm
See Dyer v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 11:09 am
Here are some snippets:Judicial power includes the power (1) to resolve disputes, State Board of Education v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 9:18 am
Walter Nixon v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 8:42 am
He also authored Zeran v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 6:22 am
In particular, an operation that otherwise would qualify as an SMCO will no longer do so unless the military has determined that the operation in question poses one of five types of risk: (i) “a medium or high collateral effects estimate” (ii) “a medium or high intelligence gain or loss” (iii) “a medium or high probability of political retaliation, as determined by the political military assessment contained with the associated concept of operations” (iv) “a… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 5:50 am
V. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:13 am
” In Burke v. [read post]
