Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 15,039
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
In doing so, it takes into account the current state of Canadian law and public policy, the growth of empirical research on IVF and the development of increased case law relating to the disposition of reproductive materials. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 5:51 am
Kipp v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:44 am
Part of the Bill of Rights put into the Constitution in 1791, it guarantees a “right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:31 pm
(d) The judge was wrong to reject MGN’s submission that damages for breach of privacy are compensation for injured feelings and are not intended to mark wrongdoing, such damages being vindicatory in effect and therefore contrary to the principles stated inLumba v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 1:50 pm
See Kallick v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed, with the… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:30 am
The Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s ruling, explaining that “Under FOIL, agency records are presumptively available for public inspection, without regard to the need or purpose of the applicant, unless the requested documents fall within one of the exemptions set forth in Public Officers Law §87(2)," citing Williamson v Fischer, 116 AD3d 1169, leave to appeal denied, 24 NY3d 904.The court said that "[e]xemptions are narrowly construed, with the… [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:58 pm
In Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:52 am
Yet Zivotofsky v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:28 am
In the five years after the Court invalidated the Gun-Free School Zones Act for exceeding the scope of the federal Commerce Power in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 8:10 pm
Supreme Court engaged deeply in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:15 pm
Federal standards cover private sector employers and employees in all 50 states and the District of Columbia 25 states have also approved safety and health plans, most are identical to the federal OSHA rules. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
See McIntyre v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
United States), and will clarify the standard for summoning a special three-judge U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
And in breaking news, the Supreme Court this morning granted cert in Sila Luis v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 6:23 am
It found no merit to the employer’s argument (premised on Justice White’s concurrence in Eastex v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am
This seemed to have been confirmed by the decision, not long afterwards, in Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Bear with me dear reader, as I recognise the gravity of disgreeing with all of Floyd LJ, Ryder LJ, Arden LJ and Arnold J.But not everyonedoes ...The problem this Kat has is that they all rely on the subjective state of the infringer, whether it is subjective intent, or knowledge, even if the knowledge is constructive knowledge. [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
The Fourteenth Amendment allowed the Court to bring these protections to bear against state law. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 9:14 am
Supreme Court will say about civil marriage in Obergefell v. [read post]
