Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 16,708
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2018, 7:00 am
The trial was to be short, the parties and the district court were ready, and the case presented no issues of special state court expertise, nor any novel questions of state law. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 1:01 am
The case was appealed to the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:12 pm
The plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment, and the FBO intervened in the action and filed a cross-motion. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 7:42 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Brady v United States, you have a right to get from the prosecutors evidence that may negate your guilt. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:19 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 7:39 am
Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 4:30 am
In Crenshaw v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 10:30 am
— United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Such studies involve many layers of hearsay evidence, measurements of exposures, diagnoses, records, and the like, which cannot be “cross-examined. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:28 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:04 am
Thus the decision in Siderman de Blake v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 7:12 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
This is my second post on United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm
Alfred v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:41 pm
See Hale v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:38 am
In her majority opinion, Justice O’Connor wrote that “while a State, consistent with the First Amendment, may ban cross burning carried out with the intent to intimidate, the provision in the Virginia statute treating any cross burning as prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate renders the statute unconstitutional in its current form. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:55 am
Cross v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 9:07 am
Court of Appeals faced in Hopkins v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 5:15 am
The ambiguous and often tragic world of alleged and actual sex offenders - running the gamut from harmless experimentation and role-playing to sinister preying on defenseless victims - is brought into sharp relief in the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
