Search for: "Hand v. State"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 30,524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2014, 9:28 am
Associated Electrical Industries Ltd v Alstom UK [2014] EWHC 430 is the latest case to be handed down in the post Jackson/Mitchell dystopian legal world (see here, here and here for our other notes). [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:37 am
So says the Court of Appeal in its reasons for decision in Biancaniello v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
On the other hand, he does have standing to assert a UCL claim against the fraudster: Simply stated: labels matter. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
On the other hand, he does have standing to assert a UCL claim against the fraudster: Simply stated: labels matter. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:28 am
In Gundy v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 5:12 am
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:13 pm
There are three southbound lanes—two through lanes and a left-hand-turn lane—at the intersection of West Henrietta Road and Brighton Henrietta Town Line Road. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 10:23 am
In Experi-Metal v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:13 am
He filed an amicus brief for the state in support of the church in Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 11:07 am
The Court Finds the Composition Claims Are Patentable Subject Matter Before making its determination, the Court traced the state of the law regarding § 101 by looking at the Supreme Court’s decisions in Diamond v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 8:00 am
Mazars/Trump v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 5:13 am
For each decision the Supreme Court handed down, the losing party would revise its strategy. [read post]
11 May 2009, 10:05 pm
By Eric Goldman FPX, LLC v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 12:30 am
A hearing was held on 26 September 2017 and judgment was handed down on 19 October 2017. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 11:15 pm
Your employee, Tommy, hands you a doctor’s note – usually no more than one sentence long – stating simply: Tommy’s pinky toe hurts. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 12:09 pm
Today, I discuss the seminal California Supreme Court premises liability case of Rowland v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm
That is why the assembling of the evidence has been put into the hands of the business partners and not of the solicitors. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:04 am
California, the state which created this tort in 1984, has now done away with it. [read post]
