Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 9,823
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 2:31 pm
Div. 1999); In re M.D.Z., 286 N.J. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:49 am
We are glad you’re here. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 11:21 am
They're ours. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:38 am
This was always going to fail: the Court of Justice deals with appeals on legal grounds only doesn't interfere with the General Court's findings of fact unless they're so distorted that they must have constituted some sort of collective aberration on the part of judges. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:06 am
Later in the chapter, Berger does discuss a specific-causation decision by Judge Jack Weinstein, in In re Zyprexa, 2009 WL 1357236 (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:35 pm
I think they're all flawed.Scalia and Thomas presume too much (way too much) about their own historical and linguistic analyses. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm
First, by adopting institutional governance structures designed to promote more efficient decision making. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:18 pm
Conventional bombs couldn’t touch it so inventor Barnes Wallace designed a weapon specifically for the job. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:38 pm
Judge Long was sympathetic to Mr. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:49 pm
The attorneys representing Episcopal Church interests also brought the judge three exhibits and a thick binder of material re-copied from previously-filed documents. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:48 am
But second, and more to the point, the First Amendment was designed to protect our freedom of expression. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
In re DV International, Inc., Serial No. 77501020 (September 29, 2011) [not precedential]. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 11:44 am
Judging by the oral arguments (summarized and linked to in the HuffPo article linked above), and the questions that the Justices asked the attorneys, it appears that a majority have already made up their mind, and they’re going to come out the side of the company, not the consumers. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
One billion dollars in unpaid surcharges – no wonder they’re having some hearings down in Austin. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
[By the way, I've heard a TTAB Judge say that most 2(d) cases can be decided just by looking at the involved goods/services and the marks.] [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:12 am
" In re Kubin, 561 F.3d 1351, 1355 (Fed. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 6:50 am
But if you’re after a little less pressure and a nice paycheck, you could do worse than the boardroom of WMS Industries, at least to judge by the proxy it filed yesterday. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 12:15 pm
Humanitarian Law Project — and even that opinion stressed that the restricted speech remained free if it was said without coordination with designated terrorist organizations. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:17 am
You can, if you’re interested, read more about that in the article you can find here. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 10:59 am
However, once you're in, forget about it. [read post]
