Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 5:29 am
United States, the government informed the D.C. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:58 pm
The Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit recently upheld a father's conviction under the Deadbeat Dad Act in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:04 am
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 7:51 am
How the PA workers’ comp insurer proves that a worker is undocumented or illegal, and not eligible for employment in Pennsylvania (or in the United States as a whole), was recently addressed by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania in Kennett Square Specialties v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:53 am
All of the amounts required to be paid by this Code section shall be paid in lawful money of the United States to the purchaser at the tax sale or to the purchaser’s successors. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:46 pm
The United States had abandoned the argument that the Anti-Injunction Act barred the health care lawsuits, but urged the justices in its petition to resolve the question. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am
One petition that they will consider is Center for Competitive Politics v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 7:14 am
In EDWARDS v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 8:11 am
The technology at issue, amlodipine besylate tablets, is commercially sold in the United States by Pfizer under the trademark Norvasc ®. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
In the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
The Court also dismissed the petition for review in Arizona v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
The Court also dismissed the petition for review in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 3:30 pm
Click here for a summary of the underlying case.PD-0873-09, State v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 8:53 am
Indeed, the United States and Pennsylvania have trusted Mr. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Plaintiffs-Appellants filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, seeking a preliminary injunction against an ordinance regulating sexually oriented businesses on the ground that the ordinance violated Plaintiffs-Appellants' First Amendment and Due Process rights. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:57 am
In Breard v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
United States (06-1509): docket, petition, brief in opposition, reply. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 4:05 am
United States, 459 U.S. 131 (1982), the Supreme Court held that when an agency issues sequential decisions, reversal by a court of a later decision does not automatically reinstate an earlier one. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 4:30 pm
It seems to me that in canvassing the United States Code (and its own caselaw) for analogous statutory provisions (and its prior interpretations of those provisions), the Court is looking for a way to maintain consistency across the United States Code. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:26 pm
The Ninth Circuit stated in Morales v. [read post]
