Search for: "State of Connecticut"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 17,231
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2014, 5:07 pm
Objectors intervened in the proceedings and submitted evidence that BNE had failed to establish that the proposed projects would comply with state noise law and water qual¬ity standards. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 5:07 pm
In 2010, pursuant to General Statutes § 16-50k (a)4 and § 4-176(a), BNE sought approval from the Connecticut Siting Council to construct and operate 1.6-megawatt wind turbines at two locations in Colebrook without first obtaining a certificate of environmental compatibility and public need. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 4:32 pm
Despite agreeing that the plain text of the state’s disability discrimination law does not protect individuals who are perceived to be physically disabled from employment discrimination, a divided Connecticut Supreme Court nonetheless found that the legislative history of the act, considered in conjunction with Connecticut case law and the interpretation of the act by the state Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities compelled the conclusion that the… [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 8:11 am
(Discipline for untruthfulness generally is discussed here, here and here.)The Supreme Court of Connecticut has now addressed this issue. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 8:53 am
Unfortunately, clinicians and facilities across the United States have responded to these questions in inconsistent and ad hoc ways. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 11:03 am
” Connecticut has regulated groomers since January 6, 1970, according to Joseph Holstead, reporting on existing state regulations in 2006 . [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 6:45 am
Were Nebraska and Oklahoma able to convince the Supreme Court that Colorado has an affirmative duty to control marijuana use within the state, it won’t be long before New York, Connecticut and other northeastern states are in federal court arguing that Oklahoma, Nebraska, and other states have an affirmative obligation to control greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 2:25 am
Another attempt to sue a gunmaker is currently in the works in Connecticut. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:01 pm
Connecticut Department of Transportation, et al. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm
Connecticut, New York, and Vermont are also challenging the NRC rule. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 5:10 pm
He has testified before Congress as well as State Legislatures. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 2:53 pm
The Connecticut case may provide a new avenue for an individual plaintiff to sue for a health data breach under state law by using HIPAA indirectly when he or she cannot sue under HIPAA itself directly. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:15 am
Connecticut (8), Maine (4), Maryland (5), Massachusetts (35), Montana (1), New Hampshire (6), New York (21), Ohio (3), Pennsylvania (17), Rhode Island (7), Vermont (3) and Virginia (1). [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:14 am
Connecticut (8), Maine (4), Maryland (5), Massachusetts (35), Montana (1), New Hampshire (6), New York (21), Ohio (3), Pennsylvania (17), Rhode Island (7), Vermont (3) and Virginia (1). [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 10:06 am
Connecticut (8), Maine (4), Maryland (5), Massachusetts (35), Montana (1), New Hampshire (6), New York (21), Ohio (3), Pennsylvania (17), Rhode Island (7), Vermont (3) and Virginia (1). [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 7:42 am
In five states, 80 percent of counties had rates lower than the national rate: Connecticut, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Rhode Island and Wyoming. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 3:15 pm
Constantinou and the mortgage broker were former partners at C&S Mortgage and had agreed, by the terms of a 2004 settlement agreement with the Connecticut Department of State Banking, to receive no commissions or money from each other. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:55 pm
George Smith, of the Greenwich Connecticut area, had disappeared in the Aegean Sea during his honeymoon cruise. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:33 pm
A lawsuit has been filed in the Superior Court at Bridgeport in Connecticut, which may well allow for a meaningful hearing of these and many other questions. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:08 pm
The complaint also argues that the defendants’ actions violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, thus presumably fitting within the federal Act’s exception for “a manufacturer or seller of a qualified product [who] knowingly violated a State or Federal statute applicable to the sale or marketing of the product. [read post]
