Search for: "State v. Keis" Results 6941 - 6960 of 22,499
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2017, 1:43 am
  The cross-licence is governed by the laws of the state of California. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:24 am by Michael C. Dorf
The key is the difference between asking--i.e., jawboning--versus requiring through the coercive power of the state. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Ronald M. Levin
Supreme Court’s recent travel ban case, Trump v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
Supreme Court finally ruled that many restrictions on lawyer advertising violated free speech, in Bates v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 11:56 am by Eduardo Penalver
  The key point is that, even in private-to-private takings, there is always a governmental actor seeking to advance a state objective. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 7:01 am by William Baude
The Supreme Court has heard a lot of preemption suits, but Tuesday’s arguments in Armstrong v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 10:27 am by Lovechilde
 The private sector is the key for our economy. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
   On 11 December 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in Mastercard v Merricks, dismissing Mastercard’s appeal. [read post]
On 25 June 2021 Meade J handed down his decision in the second of a series of trials listed as part of the Optis v Apple UK action ([2021] EWHC 1739 (Pat); a link the judgment is here). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:39 am by Wanda
[All of the facts in this post come from the 11th Circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:54 pm by Anna Kloeden
The European Court of Human Rights yesterday began a public hearing in the case of Tymoshenko v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 11:47 pm by INFORRM
Although it is not so stated in the judgment, presumably David Price submitted that this principle applies even where the first article is on the front page, and the second article is elsewhere in the paper. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court heard arguments in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:38 pm by paperstreet
P. 24; see also  Golight, 355 F.3d at 1338; State Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
Even if we chose to apply the reckless disregard injury standard, it is for the trier of fact to decide whether Maher complied with that standard, given that so many key details of the accident are the subject of contradictory allegations (compare, Saarinen v Kerr, 84 NY2d 494 [facts of accident undisputed]). [read post]