Search for: "State v. Law"
Results 6941 - 6960
of 173,904
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2023, 2:58 pm
Parke v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 1:55 pm
And in Holder v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:32 am
In Baxalta Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:15 am
Freeman, 92 U.S. 275 (1875) [preprint]- Chapter 4: Commentary on United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 9:57 am
Even though the PTO has refused to register it, he remains free to use the mark, and well might obtain an exclusive right to use the mark under common-law doctrines enforceable under state law. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 8:27 am
The plaintiff claimed that federal law didn’t preempt his state law claim, but the court breezily rejects that. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 8:12 am
Doe v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 7:54 am
From DWJ v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
This comes amidst a backdrop where AI models currently cannot be recognized as inventors, a stance reaffirmed in the Federal Circuit decision Thaler v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:10 am
The bill, Ending Corporate Influence on Elections Act of 2023, would “begin to undo” the Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court's rejection of Defendants' [City Respondents] motion to dismiss Plaintiff's causes of action alleging discrimination and retaliation under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] and New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL]; her aiding and abetting claims; and her claims under the Gender-Motivated Violence Act [GMVA]* was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, without costs. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court's rejection of Defendants' [City Respondents] motion to dismiss Plaintiff's causes of action alleging discrimination and retaliation under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] and New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL]; her aiding and abetting claims; and her claims under the Gender-Motivated Violence Act [GMVA]* was unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, without costs. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 4:39 am
Justice John Paul Stevens, dissenting in Boy Scouts v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
In Fitz-James v. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 12:15 am
In Leff v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm
The PR states that LDTs are not the “practice of medicine,” with which FDA generally may not interfere. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:02 pm
“Second, a plaintiff can demonstrate that the law violates the balancing test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:46 pm
On October 25, 2023, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in True Health Chiropractic, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 6:32 pm
In United States v. [read post]
