Search for: "State v. So" Results 6941 - 6960 of 117,821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2023, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Many other states, including California, Nebraska, Illinois, and Florida, have similar statutes. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 7:46 pm by Blair & Kim, PLLC
A Washington Domestic Violence Protection Order (“DVPO”) may order a respondent to participate in state-certified treatment, and failure to do so may be considered if the petitioner seeks renewal. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
To be a driver, one must be driving a vehicle (activity) and must do so on a highway (locus). [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Mr Bloom’s brief was to make recommendations to the Secretary of State on how government should engage with faith groups in England. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am by Eric Goldman
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Incorporation has vastly expanded the Court’s authority to regulate the states, without the sanction of legislation or amendment under Article V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Incorporation has vastly expanded the Court’s authority to regulate the states, without the sanction of legislation or amendment under Article V. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
SUBLICENSE VIOLATED STATE'S FRANCHISE SALES ACTBecause they paid fees to defendants so that “D’Lites” brand ice-cream products could be sold in plaintiffs’ stores, the latter filed suit in New York County Supreme Court alleging violations of the state’s Franchise Sales Act. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, Egbert has no bearing on Disney's suit for declaratory and injunctive relief against state officials (where both a federal statute and the doctrine of Ex Parte Young provide causes of action).Even so, as Prof Buchanan observed in his essay here yesterday, there is a prima facie similarity between Disney's lawsuit and the challenge to the third version of Trump's Travel Ban that SCOTUS rejected in Trump v. [read post]