Search for: "Thomas v. State" Results 6941 - 6960 of 15,510
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2016, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center, Lisa Soronen looks back at last month’s argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:19 pm by Walter Olson
New Oxford vice chancellor speaks out against threats to free inquiry as well as overregulation of universities [Iain Martin, CapX] Feds: get in line on Title IX or we’ll yank your institutional science funding [Inside Higher Ed, background on Title IX] More on scheme proposing mandatory oppression studies for first-year students at American University [Robby Soave/The Daily Beast (and thanks for mention), earlier] Back to the days of Plessy v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 1:02 pm by Kirk Jenkins
In the closing days of its January term, a sharply divided Illinois Supreme Court abolished the public duty rule in Coleman v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 12:49 pm by Jonathan Witmer-Rich
Today the Sixth Circuit handed down a notable opinion squarely addressing the question, reserved in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on the same day Lord Thomas CJ and Nicola Davies J gave judgment on remedy in the case of HM Attorney-General v Conde Nast Publications Ltd. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:29 am by Alex R. McQuade
In Sunday’s Foreign Policy Essay, Thomas Juneau outlined Canada’s policy to confront the Islamic State. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:51 pm by Patricia Salkin
Queen v Union Townships Board of Zoning Appeals, 2016 WL 228268 (OH App. 1/19/2016)Filed under: Agricultural Uses, Current Caselaw, Special Use/Exception, Uncategorized [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
) [1] Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan v Federation of Pakistan and ors 1954 SHC 81. [2] See e.g. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am by Jack Sharman
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:30 pm
As the United States Supreme Court wrote in Chessman v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 5:47 pm by Law Lady
TOMMY CONSTANTINE RACING, LLC, a foreign limited liability company, and TOMMY CONSTANTINE, a/k/a THOMAS CONSTANTINE, individually, Appellees. 4th District. [read post]