Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 28,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 5:03 am
State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:25 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 1:30 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 4:00 pm
In Castro v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:00 am
(Twelve years earlier, Felton acknowledged paternity even though he knew he wasn't the child's biological father.) [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
The leading case which discusses allocation of child tax exemptions in New Jersey is Gwodz v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:36 am
Carver v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 8:21 pm
In R. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 11:38 am
In other words, do not count on a contract for child support to be the final say on the paying parent's obligations.Any contracts involving child custody that you may want to enter should be reviewed by a competent family law attorney who will tell you what the law is and how solid the contract will be when examined by a judge.To read the entire opinion, you may click here: http://www.nevadajudiciary.us/index.php/advancedopinions/648-fernandez-v-fernandez [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:04 am
Merely pointing out that states don’t always follow one’s policy preferences is hardly a strong argument against federalism. (2) Professor Logan Sawyer of the University of Georgia Law School coincidentally has an excellent piece out on SSRN about the origins of Court’s holding in Hammer v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 11:59 am
Well, as set forth in the recently unpublished (not precedential) Appellate Division decision, Henao v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 6:01 am
Devine v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:40 am
Supreme Court decision, Michael H. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 3:59 am
Rudd v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:21 am
Although the real debate was likely to be about the innuendo meaning, R v Smith (Graham Westgarth) ([2002] EWCA Crim 683, [2003] 1 Cr App R 13) had dealt with what constituted the “making” of an indecent image, R v Smith considered. (3) Even if the pleaded defence was factually contentious and went beyond the statement, there was no need for injunctive relief against the press, whose editors were well aware of the duty not to prejudice criminal trials and of their… [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 11:33 am
Here are the materials in Hall v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:19 am
It reminded me of Kennedy's opinion in Lawrence v. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 8:56 am
But here's a recent example, from Hoover v. [read post]
