Search for: "Child v. Child"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 31,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2022, 2:24 pm
Matter of Joseph S. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 5:01 am
And, based on the CCA opinion in Griffith v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 11:18 am
In State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
A (A Child) v The Chief Constable of Dorset Police [2010] EWHC 1748 (Admin) (16 July 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that the gist of sensitive evidence in a case involving a child being picked up for being spotted with an “inappropriate adult” must be disclosed in order that the child can bring a claim against the police. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 2:18 pm
Holder v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 6:49 pm
Young v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:28 pm
On October 30th, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments for United States v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 2:35 pm
We previously noted ACCA's very interesting opinion in an Article 62 appeal concerning the retroactive effect of Congress lengthening the statute of limitations for child abuse offenses in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 1:16 pm
Childs v. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 8:25 am
While reading the next opinion the Oregon Supreme Court decided on Friday, State v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:31 pm
You may recall the Adar v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:31 am
” The Fifth District also relied on Baker v. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Indicated reports include those naming the child and, where the subjects of the reports involve the person or persons caring for the child, reports naming other children in the home. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 10:02 pm
Gruber v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 2:34 pm
" Hence you're not eligible for asylum even if the applicant can demonstrate that that'll happen to her (or her child) if she's deported.Needless to say, that ain't how Judge McKeown views it. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 11:48 am
That web site has child pornography on it. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:52 am
Regina (SO) v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham (The Children’s Society intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 634 1101; [2010] WLR (D) 257 “Local authorities enjoyed, by virtue of s 23C(4)(c) of the Children Act 1989, the power to accommodate a person who had formerly been a child in care and was therefore a former ‘relevant child’ within s 23A of the Act, and a local authority was not entitled, when considering whether the welfare of a former… [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:40 am
The other by Erin Sheley is entitled: Dead Men Walking: Why Kennedy v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 2:26 pm
Jennifer Roth won in State v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 11:12 am
Reviewing the factors from E.D.M. v. [read post]
