Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 6961 - 6980 of 18,112
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
I thought of that scene the other day as I read the Connecticut Supreme Court’s decision in a case called State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 7:59 am by Jocelyn Bosse
The judgment of Justice Beach in Societe Civile et Agricole du Vieux Chateau Certan v Kreglinger (Australia) Pty Ltd [2024] FCA 248 found that there was no damage, and therefore passing off was not established. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 8:13 am by Dan Bressler
‘They’re buying something else: a kind of inside information about how the court is thinking and how individual justices might be thinking,’ he said. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch President Obama has announced his nomination of Merrick Garland to become the next Supreme Court Justice. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Richard Primus
  In recent times, the Supreme Court opinion that more thoroughly nails the analytic difference Schwartz is excavating here is Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Gonzales v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:35 am
While this moggy was struggling to get back from Indonesia, the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in the pregabalin appeal Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd (t/a Mylan) & Ors [2016] EWCA Civ 1006 (13 October 2016), and finally the IPKat has managed to blog about it (the lateness by no means reflecting on the importance of the judgment).It is very much a judgment of three halves.In the first part of the judgment (up to [135]), which substantively disposes of the… [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:30 pm
LESSER/European Pressphoto Agency) From today’s decision in In re James v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 7:49 am
"The question is whether we're seeing déjà vu all over again. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 8:15 am by John Elwood
The court denied review, but Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, dissented to say that the court’s recent First Amendment jurisprudence has undercut the legal basis for upholding mandatory bar membership. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 5:02 am by SHG
  That would be the language the Court of Appeals held unconstitutional in People v. [read post]