Search for: "Label v Label" Results 6961 - 6980 of 13,306
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2013, 7:49 am by Paul Horwitz
Presumably, then, they would argue that whether they can do it well or not, it's what they're called upon to do just the same, and Article V will serve as a safety valve. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 12:47 pm by Kate Fort
  What, she asked Blatt, is the point of labeling Father as a “parent” if he doesn’t have any rights as such? [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Amy Howe
  What, she asked Blatt, is the point of labeling Father as a “parent” if he doesn’t have any rights as such? [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 11:30 am by Ron Coleman
To some extent I guess it is what it is, and labels be darned, but after all trademarks are all about labels, and perhaps here there is a distinction between the two. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am by Jack McNeill
The “duty of sameness” as a shield—generic drug manufacturers’ tort liability and the need for label independence after …  (PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 8:19 am
Almost all the yoghurt sold to the public in the UK in the 25 years before 2012 with descriptions including "Greek yoghurt" on the labels on the pots was strained yoghurt -- and it was made in Greece, like that of FAGE; this labelling appeared to be a matter of convention in the UK. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 11:19 am by LTA-Editor
” In an order that at times appears somewhat out of touch with contemporary developments—for example, Capitol Records is described as a “recording label” known for producing “vinyls”—Judge Sullivan granted Capitol’s motion for summary judgment on its claims of copyright infringement. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Playing with reality v. paper rights to compromise reflecting different systems. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
In a recent case on discrimination, Law Society of Upper Canada v. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 2:39 pm by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The appeal centers on the applicability of two prior court rulings, particularly PLIVA v. [read post]