Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 6961 - 6980 of 13,583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Dec 2016, 1:24 pm by Pierre T. Nguyen
., United States Patent and Trademark Office). [read post]
Nixon (Nixon v United States) and President Fernando C. de Mello (De Mello v Speaker of the House of Representatives), but followed different paths: The Supreme Court of the United States reaffirmed the political question doctrine whilst the Brazilian Supremo Tribunal Federal reaffirmed its alleged interpretive supremacy.Justice Paulo Brossard, in a passage from his dissent in De Mello, essayed a shared case law. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:43 am
First, that its fees were in fact Class I costs of administration, which are stated by RSA 402-C:44, I to include “reasonable attorney’s fees. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 6:30 pm
This represents a most interesting development of Western Hemispher and developing state Leninism, the transposibility of which remains uintested. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:30 am
Destruction of records that may be relevant in pending litigationByrnie v Town of Cromwell Board of Education, CA2, 243 F.3d 93 EEOC regulation implementing Title VII [42 USC 2000e-8(c)] requires “every employer ... subject to this subchapter” to “(1) make and keep such records relevant to the determinations of whether unlawful employment practices have been or are being committed, [and] (2) preserve such records for [two years]. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 12:29 pm by Doug Cornelius
It’s not clear how the reporting requirement will specifically interact with the various state secretaries of state who are responsible for company formation. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In response (and also in the Times), Stephen Vladeck pointed to the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]