Search for: "Summers v. Summers"
Results 6961 - 6980
of 9,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2011, 2:18 pm
See URI Student Senate v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:52 am
Your perspectives are welcome in the comments.Simkin v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:01 pm
That ruling was in a 1997 case, Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
Supreme Court in cases like Lochner v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:53 am
Bling Bling for Wealthy Lawyers Watches Big-Ass Yachts High Class Call Girls V. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:05 am
A school employee giving reasonable assurance of continued employment is ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits between school yearsMatter of Sultana v New York City Dept. of Educ., 2010 NY Slip Op 09598, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentIt is “black letter law” that "A professional employee of an educational institution is precluded from receiving unemployment insurance benefits during the time between two successive academic years where the claimant has… [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 1:41 pm
That turns out to be Michael Moulton, who produced electronic textbooks for Faulkner Press, which unsuccessfully sued the for-profit note site Einstein's Notes (Faulkner Press v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:54 am
So far he only has a little list, relating to the patents for (i) Escitalopram, (ii) Lipitor, (iii) Viagra and (iv) Olanzapine, plus Conor Medsystems v Angiotech. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
Mansfield & Helen V. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 9:05 pm
Gates and Major Gary V. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Justice BhatThe Delhi High Court in Shri Rohit Shekhar vs Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari & Anr., has examined the concept of DNA testing and the law pertaining to the same. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 6:49 am
See Nazar v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Rank v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:59 pm
Watch for the decision in McDonald v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 5:01 am
Several weeks ago, in Driscoll v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:53 am
Article 35 of the Law on Trademarks (Royal Decree No: 38/2000) states as follows: A punishment by imprisonment for a period not exceeding two years and/or fine not exceeding [Omani Rial] RO 2000 shall be applicable to any person who: (i) counterfeits a mark registered under this law, imitates such a mark in a manner that is likely to mislead the public or uses in bad faith a counterfeited or imitated mark; (ii) knowingly sells, offers for sale or circulation or possesses with the intention to sell… [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
Moreover, as I noted several years ago in an article on the landmark right of publicity case of Uhleander v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 5:04 am
Other Resources: Washington Post article re: EEOC v. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 1:38 pm
Park of the University of California Hastings College of Law, and colleagues, have published Bayes Wars Redivivus — An Exchange, International Commentary on Evidence, v. 8, no. 1, article 1 (2010). [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 9:03 am
In Wilson v. [read post]
