Search for: "US v. Smith" Results 6961 - 6980 of 8,561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 9:55 am by Rekha Arulanantham
To me, what it all comes down to is a deeply personal decision, a decision granted to women in Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright IP Kat uses the recent Oasis reunion to recap some of the IP issues that have concerned the band over the years. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
Eaton presented on the differences in the use of toxicology in regulatory pronouncements as opposed to causal assessments in civil actions. [read post]
9 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In a Guardian Comment piece Joan Smith argued that the Mahmood conviction demonstrated the urgent need for Leveson Part 2. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
With meticulous care and a deft blend of legal analysis and dramatic narrative, Alison LaCroix has raised the bar on showing us how much can be learned by a close study of neglected aspects of the long founding era. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 4:21 pm
Smith, No. 08-11665, 2009 WL 693342 (11th Cir., March 18, 2009), noting that the district court could upwardly depart in sentencing the defendant based upon violations of the defendant’s supervised release, pursuant to U.S.S.G. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Many modern longitudinal epidemiologic studies and clinical trials use survival analysis and time windows to identify latency or time lagged outcomes in association with identified exposures. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Warby J heard an application in the case of Theedom v Nourish Trading Ltd Green J also heard an application in the case of Smith v Persons Unknown. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:08 am by Bexis
Wyeth, Inc., 588 F.3d 603, 612-14 (8th Cir. 2009), reaffirmed after remand, 658 F.3d 867 (8th Cir. 2011).Also there’s Smith v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm by Lovechilde
Smith promised to remove the language but used “a sly legislative maneuver” that essentially informs the courts that statutory rape cases will not be covered by Medicaid should the law pass and be challenged in court. [read post]