Search for: "Active Drive Inc" Results 681 - 700 of 1,877
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2017, 2:45 pm
Amnesty International and the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre have produced an important intervention in the contemporaneity debates about the nature and scope of corporate obligation with respect to human rights. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The President’s efforts to put his nominees on the federal bench could have a far greater impact than his more attention-grabbing activities. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:16 am by Peter Hunt
Did the cruise line properly monitor the activities of the tour/excursion operator? [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 6:00 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
In that sense, a Title III proceeding can be used by the debtor as both a shield to protect the PPP transaction and a sword to drive the PPP transaction toward execution as part of a plan of adjustment. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:46 am by Mark Theodore
 The Board applied Continental Group, Inc., 357 NLRB 409 (2011) which holds that an unlawfully overbroad rule may violate Section 8(a)(1) in two situations:  if the employee was disciplined for engaging either in protected activity or, for conduct that is not concerted, but “touches the concerns animating Section 7. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:46 am by Mark Theodore
 The Board applied Continental Group, Inc., 357 NLRB 409 (2011) which holds that an unlawfully overbroad rule may violate Section 8(a)(1) in two situations:  if the employee was disciplined for engaging either in protected activity or, for conduct that is not concerted, but “touches the concerns animating Section 7. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:17 am by Joy Waltemath
Drive Automotive Industries of America, Inc. dba Magna Drive Automotive, which established a hybrid joint employer test under Title VII. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:31 pm by Coral Beach
James Marsden, executive director for food safety at Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 8:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Before reiterating the “drive demand” principle, the district court quoted this court’s statement in Apple, Inc. v. [read post]