Search for: "Andrews v. Hand" Results 681 - 700 of 1,574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2018, 12:49 pm by William Ford
Hayley Evans summarized the ruling handed down by the U.K. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
Sparing no modesty for a plan he personally designed with a handful of close advisors, Xi Jinping hailed BRI as the “project of the Century. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:52 pm by William Ford
ICYMI: This Weekend on Lawfare Vanessa Sauter shared the Lawfare Podcast, in which Steve Vladeck and Scott Anderson discuss the complexities of United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:17 am by Elizabeth Slattery
Indeed, the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee’s ban on soliciting votes and handing out campaign materials on the sidewalk outside polling places in Burson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:34 am by Mark Walsh
The chief justice announces that Sotomayor has the opinion today in National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Andrew Chung reports at Reuters that the justices “agreed to hear a challenge to a key Securities and Exchange Commission practice – its use of in-house judges to enforce investor protection laws” Additional coverage of the grant in Lucia v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
The Cubans, on the other hand, would emphasize the language: "which are used as a means of political and economic pressure against States and affect the sovereignty of other States. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 1 December 2017, Langstaff J handed down judgment in the case of Various Claimants v W M Morrisons Supermarket plc [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB). [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:01 am by INFORRM
In a judgment handed down today (Various Claimants v Wm Morrisons Supermarket plc [2017] EWHC 3113 (QB))[pdf] the judge held that the defendant supermarket was vicariously liable for Mr Skelton’s data breach. [read post]