Search for: "B/T Enterprises"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
He criticised Motors’ proof of use evidence, meaning its likelihood of confusion (5(2)(b)) case failed. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 8:03 am
The question in this case (Axon Enterprise v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 3:30 am
Hasn’t the employer been punished for exercising his right to contest citations? [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:51 pm
The money raised could go towards anything from launching a startup, working at a social enterprise or becoming an artist. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:55 pm
Strategy is a solution that takes you from your current situation “A” to a new situation “B. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 10:07 am
.; B & B Drywall, Inc. v Calamar Construction Management, Inc. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 7:18 am
K3 Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 7:52 am
I now strongly doubt (b). [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 9:05 pm
David and Gerald B. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:56 pm
But it would also give relief to the countless businesses that today find themselves vulnerable to patents that shouldn’t have been issued in the first place. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
§13(b). [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:00 am
Once above or below the median, the actual amount doesn't matter. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
Code Regs, tit. 8, § 11050, subd. 1(B)(1)(e).) 3. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 2:04 pm
Code Regs, tit. 8, § 11050, subd. 1(B)(1)(e).) 3. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:53 pm
Oct. 23, 2009)(per curiam) (arbitration mandamus granted) IN RE POLYMERICA, LLC D/B/A GLOBAL ENTERPRISES, INC.; from El Paso County; 8th district (08-08-00070-CV, 271 SW3d 442, 11-25-08) stay order of February 24, 2009 lifted Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.8(c), without hearing oralargument, the Court conditionally grants the petition for writ of mandamus. [read post]
29 Mar 2020, 12:51 pm
(Notice that this is different from 506(b)/Ron Pair Enterprises, where a right to post-petition interest/fees for secured claims exists no matter what the contract provides). [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:38 am
Dep’t Health & Human Services, 778 F.3d 43 (1st Cir. 2015). [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
Some stuff that was just incomprehensible to me, like Section 33(b)(6), I now know why that was there, and I now know why other things are not there, like the fact that there is no definition in the statute of likelihood of confusion; or how one comes to own a mark; or secondary meaning... [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 4:47 pm
Mayoras & Danielle B. [read post]
