Search for: "Blair v. Blair" Results 681 - 700 of 736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/yRWkxa (Henry Kelston) How to Create an eDiscovery Team – An Interview with HB Gordan from Teva Pharmaceuticals – bit.ly/xCM6yj (Amber Scorah) How to Reduce Medical Malpractice eDiscovery Issues and Costs - bit.ly/ylZmA5 (Matthew Keris) Innovation and Informed Risk-Taking are an eDiscovery Duty - bit.ly/zKtiDm (Chris Dale) Lester v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
Shannon’s article Prescribing a Balance: The Texas Legislative Responses to Sell v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 2:41 pm by familoo
This was followed shortly after by Glos CC v AB on March 2nd. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:10 pm
At least Churchill knew how to flick a good 'V sign'... as, indeed, did the English archers at Agincourt] And… on that note.. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Bissell
Blair alleges that if Japan and the US “dawdle” over the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement, China will move to “fill the vacuum. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am by Sam Cohen, Alex Vivona
  In response to the new identification law, on Sept. 8, the U.S. conducted a freedom of navigation operation (FONOP) in the vicinity of Mischief Reef (Chinese: Meiji Jiao; Tagalog: Panganiban; Vietnamese: Đá Vành Khăn), a low-tide elevation within the Philippines’ exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in the hotly disputed Spratly Islands (Malay: Kepulauan Spratly; Mandarin: Nansha Qundao; Philippines: Kapuluan ng Kalayaan; Vietnamese: Quần đảo… [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 12:48 pm
v=kcCObU0pIp8.This week, China's future global dominance was on full display as foreign leaders headed to Beijing in the hope of securing lucrative projects as part of China's Belt and Road Initiative. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by Rob Robinson
(Part 1) http://bit.ly/vZBx4k (Tom Mighell) A Proposal for Preservation Rule Amendments - http://bit.ly/nQ7Jzq (William Wallace Belt) A World of Copyright Confusion on the Web - http://bit.ly/qpGVEW (Craig Smith) ABA Formal Opinion 11-460 is at Odds With Stengart v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 2:39 pm by Josh Blackman
(He has a bad habit of ignoring unhelpful precedent; See U.S. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
FDA Advances Program for Real-World Evidence February 27, 2023 | Blair Bean Robertson, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals FDA’s approach to evidence-based decision-making may not be addressed to the right people. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:10 am by Arturo Jara
” Loving Plot: This film follows the true story of Richard and Mildred Loving, the couple behind the landmark Supreme Court case Loving v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 9:00 pm by Joseph Margulies
” In the national security assessment of 2009, Dennis Blair, then the director of national intelligence for the Obama administration, reported that the threat of terrorism was no longer the greatest risk facing the United States, a position he repeated in 2010. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Benton, Drew Berendts, Angeline Bergh, Stephen Bergmann, Matt Berkau, Brent Berrett, Bryan Berrett, Rus Berrett, Mary Beth, Larry Beute, Joe Biancalana, Todd Bice, Betty Bienert, Joseph Birthisel, Steve Bishop, Kliff Black, Chrissy Blackwell, Sandra Blackwell, Bradford Blair, Jeffrey Blumer, Tim Bock, Greg Bolton, Lyle Bonfigt, Sarah Boone, Dick Boren, Thomas Borup, Rusty Bourland, Jason W. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
When Harry Met his Ancestors – Volume I finished tantalizingly as we saw Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, following in the legal footsteps of her father-in-law, her sister-in-law, Queen Victoria ancestor to hubby Harry, and an anonymized non-royal, on her way to potential legal success in her privacy claim. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:35 am by Kara OBrien
Richard Grime, a Partner with O’Melveny & Myers and Practice Center Contributor, sent  in this article that he wrote along with Katherine Buchanan entitled Implications of the U.K. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
Dennis Blair, and former General Counsel for the National Security Agency, Stewart Baker, have claimed that the law of war is “inadequate” or “irrelevant” in the context of cyber conflict (Nakashima, 2010; Gjelten, 2010). [read post]