Search for: "Branch v. United States"
Results 681 - 700
of 4,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2019, 8:00 am
Jackson's Bank Veto Reconsidered, which is forthcoming in volume 71 of the Arkansas Law Review (2019): President Andrew Jackson (LC)Andrew Jackson's 1832 veto of the bill to recharter the Second Bank of the United States is conventionally understood as a monumental rejection of judicial supremacy, in which the President defied the Supreme Court's constitutional ruling in McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 10:07 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:36 pm
In Douglas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:30 am
He argued that while there may be legal limits on presidential power to ban noncitizens from the United States, the courts should still defer to the executive branch, taking Donald Trump’s word for it that he is no longer intent on banning Muslims from the United States. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 8:24 am
United States, in which the court upheld the application of issue preclusion to bar relitigation of mistried counts when a defendant was acquitted of some counts and the jury hung on others. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 6:27 am
United States, 21-5967Issue: Whether Zenon Grzegorczyk is entitled to relief on his claim that knowingly using a facility of interstate commerce with intent that a murder be committed, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:33 am
United States and Perez v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 11:20 am
Judge Walton, Sullivan says, also never found that the petitioner raised a finger against the United States or its allies. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 11:11 pm
The "Officers of the United States" Are Appointed Positions in the Executive and Judicial Branches, not the President. b. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
United States.[7] The Court, however, quickly backed down from its anti-delegation rule in Schechter, possibly because of FDR’s court-packing plan. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:49 pm
United States’ Argument Ed Kneedler argued for the United States here, and the argument was a delight for law professors like me. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 5:28 am
Contrary to the defendants’ contentions, their evidence failed to conclusively establish that the independent contractor exception or the discretionary function exception to the FTCA’s waiver of sovereign immunity applied to bar the plaintiffs’ potential claim against the United States Government (see generally Haskin v U.S., 569 Fed Appx at 15; Andrulonis v U.S., 952 F2d 652, 655 [2d Cir]; Esgrance v United… [read post]
25 May 2022, 1:41 pm
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm
The Supreme Court endorsed such a test in a case called Boumediene v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:53 pm
United States. [read post]
