Search for: "CHANCELLOR v. CHANCELLOR"
Results 681 - 700
of 2,432
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2019, 7:52 am
From Garner v. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 10:03 am
In one of these cases—Pierce v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:18 am
Gilham v Ministry of Justice , heard 5 June 2019 and 6 June 2019. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599, a decision with significant implications for data protection law and practice. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 3:05 am
” VC Slights cited the Delaware Supreme Court’s recent decision in Marchand v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 2:37 pm
Discussion Vice Chancellor’s reliance upon and citation to the Delaware Supreme Court’s Marchand v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
But Vice Chancellor McCormick’s recent order in Daugherty v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
An example of this that I discuss in Multiple Chancellors is Panama Refining Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 8:17 am
” “New Insights On Privilege, Ethics Duties For In-House Attys” — “In Fischman v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:52 pm
Franzini, University Chancellor; V. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 12:44 pm
Aug. 21, 2019), Vice Chancellor Joseph R. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 3:55 pm
Unfortunately, in December 2018, Delaware Chancery Court Vice Chancellor Travis Laster held in Sciabacucchi v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:50 am
It’s not often that you find a court rolling up its sleeves and digging into the mechanics of no-shop & termination fee clauses, but that’s what Vice Chancellor Slights did in his recent decision in Genuine Parts Co. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
As the code provides in § 36-3-301(a)(1),All regular ministers, preachers, pastors, priests, rabbis and other spiritual leaders of every religious belief, more than eighteen (18) years of age, having the care of souls, and all members of the county legislative bodies, county mayors, judges, chancellors, former chancellors and former judges of this state, former county executives or county mayors of this state, former members of quarterly county courts or county commissions,… [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC argues that following the case of Andy Wightman MSP and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU it is clear that the Article 50 notification can be withdrawn at any time. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Last year, I blogged about Vice Chancellor Glasscock’s letter ruling in Manti Holdings v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:53 am
The three key cases are:DFC Global Corporation v. [read post]
