Search for: "Carpenter v. State" Results 681 - 700 of 1,268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2013, 8:47 am by David Garcia
State Council of Carpenters (“AGC”), 459 U.S. 519 (1983) because he was not a participant in the market where competition was allegedly restrained; Dang was a retail consumer of NFL apparel, but the alleged restraint occurred in the upstream market for NFL apparel licenses. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 5:39 am by Garrett Hinck
Sauter posted the government's reply brief in Carpenter v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 1:31 pm
Though he doubts a parole board would set Penry free, Hon said, he can't guarantee Carpenter's family that it would never happen. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:15 am by Cormac Early
Again at the Volokh Conspiracy, Nick Rosencranz responds to arguments in the amicus brief filed by Dale Carpenter and others in United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by William Ford
Unsatisfied by her response, Nadler concluded his questioning by rather bluntly stating that the Trump administration will need to offer a more compelling argument to reauthorize the “perhaps useless” CDR program than “maybe someday it’ll do some good. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 1:39 pm
Carpenter, and Union Pacific Railroad v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am by Wally Zimolong
 Building and Construction Trades Council of Metropolitan District v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:17 am by Wally Zimolong
 Building and Construction Trades Council of Metropolitan District v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Collins v. [read post]