Search for: "Consolidated Plaintiffs "
Results 681 - 700
of 5,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2024, 10:22 am
(D.S.D.) -- in consolidated cases involving motions for attorney’s fees, ruling that: (1) plaintiff was both eligible and entitled to attorney’s fees in first case, which the agency did not contest; and (2) plaintiff’s lawsuit was unnecessary to obtain requested records in second case, and thus plaintiff was ineligible for attorney’s fees. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 7:25 am
Only . . . after the Texas Action was consolidated with the New York Action and as [plaintiff] prepared its § 101 motion, did [defendant] serve the Covenant. . . . [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 9:56 am
In fact, the Circuit Court explained at page 13 that where the plaintiff relies solely on the text of the debt collection letter, “if there was nothing deceptive-seeming about the communication the court would have to dismiss the case. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 12:20 pm
Federal consolidation is common in pharmaceutical and medical device complex litigation. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 5:34 am
Under Wisconsin law, however, a private nuisance is an interference with a real property interest, which the plaintiffs did not contend. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
Plaintiff’s appointment with the new police agency was subject to his satisfactorily completing a probationary period. [read post]
8 May 2019, 8:18 pm
According to the Opinion, this case was also consolidated with the claim of the other Plaintiff who was in the other vehicle that was involved in the accident with Plaintiff Yzkanin. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
By way of background: last year, the district court consolidated two putative, kitchen-sink-style class actions filed in the wake of the Snowden revelations to challenge the lawfulness of the government’s bulk telephony metadata program. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:32 pm
On May 14, a judge in the Northern District of California granted in part and dismissed in part four motions to dismiss filed by defendants in the consolidated class action, Opperman v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:46 am
Consolidation also saves costs for the plaintiffs. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 6:46 am
Consolidation also saves costs for the plaintiffs. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:43 am
The suits are mostly filed in federal court, meaning the parties consolidated them as an MDL. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:12 am
These cases were filed in various courts and then consolidated into seven MDL cases in the federal courts in West Virginia. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 11:10 am
(it’s a German company), Mirena is a product sold nationally, so plaintiffs affected by the device likely live across the United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:59 am
The Plaintiff filed the Complaint in Lackawanna County on account of the fact that the Plaintiff's UIM policy with Erie Insurance Exchange had a forum selection clause that required the lawsuit to be pursued in the county of the insured's domicile or residence (which was Lackawanna County). [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 3:39 pm
Recently, a Texas federal jury in Dallas has awarded $502 million total to five separate plaintiffs after a lengthy consolidated trial involving defective DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implants manufactured by DePuy Orthopaedics and Johnson & Johnson (J&J). [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 12:21 pm
Today, a Texas federal jury in Dallas has awarded $502 million total to five separate plaintiffs after a lengthy consolidated trial involving defective Pinnacle Hip Implants manufactured by DePuy Orthopaedics and Johnson & Johnson (J&J). [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 11:28 am
Recently, a Texas federal jury in Dallas has awarded $502 million total to five separate plaintiffs after a lengthy consolidated trial involving defective DePuy Pinnacle Hip Implants manufactured by DePuy Orthopaedics and Johnson & Johnson (J&J). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:57 am
” In Novastar, the lead plaintiff filed a 104 page consolidated complaint. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 5:02 am
The Fifth Circuit explained that its prior cases need not be extended because the new plaintiffs “could have availed themselves of Zeidman and Sandoz by filing a separate complaint, which could have been consolidated with the original suit, had that suit not been moot. [read post]
