Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 681 - 700
of 48,936
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am
Salamone v Deily & Glastetter, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31569(U) May 3, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 160104/2022Judge: Shlomo S. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:05 am
In Zăicescu and Fălticineanu v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there will be an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490 and a statement in open court in the case of Davies -v- BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTE [1] Basic v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
” In re Marriage of Harnack, 2022 IL App (1st) 210143 Contempt is when “[a] party who understands the court’s order but chooses to ignore the mandate” Killion v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:37 pm
The California Supreme Court’s decision in Naranjo v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:56 pm
Anteau, “The Northern District of Illinois v. the Internet: How Chicago Became the Center of Schedule A Trademark Infringement Litigation”; Law.Com, December 19, 2023. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:35 am
[7] Maslowski et al. v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:04 am
They argued the court should follow a 2013 decision from Texas, Rachal v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:25 am
This is especially true in “small business” bankruptcies under Subchapter V. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Servs., LP v Service Empls. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Servs., LP v Service Empls. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am
Finally, sequential unmasking can lead to a significant increase in costs as the legal team will need to have several calls or meetings with a candidate before asking the crucial questions to discover if the expert is supportive of their client’s position. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential ruling in Zircon Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential ruling in Zircon Corp. v. [read post]