Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 681 - 700 of 48,936
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 4:55 am by Charles Sartain
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:54 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Salamone v Deily & Glastetter, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 31569(U) May 3, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 160104/2022Judge: Shlomo S. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:57 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday 14 May 2024 there will be an application for security for costs in the case of Sikhs for Justice and another v Ranger KB-2022-004490 and a statement in open court in the case of Davies -v- BBC–KB-2024-000828. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am by Russell Knight
” In re Marriage of Harnack, 2022 IL App (1st) 210143 Contempt is when “[a] party who understands the court’s order but chooses to ignore the mandate” Killion v. [read post]
Anteau, “The Northern District of Illinois v. the Internet: How Chicago Became the Center of Schedule A Trademark Infringement Litigation”; Law.Com, December 19, 2023. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 7:04 am by Jay R. McDaniel, Esq.
  They argued the court should follow a 2013 decision from Texas, Rachal v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:25 am by Edelboim Lieberman PLLC
This is especially true in “small business” bankruptcies under Subchapter V. [read post]
10 May 2024, 2:30 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
  Finally, sequential unmasking can lead to a significant increase in costs as the legal team will need to have several calls or meetings with a candidate before asking the crucial questions to discover if the expert is supportive of their client’s position. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential ruling in Zircon Corp. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:15 am by Steve Brachmann
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential ruling in Zircon Corp. v. [read post]