Search for: "DAT"
Results 681 - 700
of 826
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm
Who Dat? [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 12:04 pm
Every time they show a saints fan yelling “Who dat! [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 9:10 pm
Of course, by my not watching, I miss television's efforts to avoid a repeat of nipple-gate and to be more lenient in running controversial commercials; and miss any further explanation of the roots of "Who Dat", including whether the phrase is or is not racially demeaning. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 4:30 pm
Clearly, Who Dat? [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 9:21 pm
Who Dat!!!!!!! [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 1:42 pm
This week’s stories include: Baidu Not Liable for Copyright Infringement Revised Google Book Search Deal Faces Renewed Opposition British Newspapers Find Copyright Trouble Microsoft Goes After a Bittorrent Tracker NFL Gives in on “Who Dat” Claims And Many more… You can download the MP3 file here (direct download). [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 10:14 am
Trademark Nation: Who Dat Who Own Who Dat? [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 8:10 am
If you’ve been paying attention recently, it’s hard to miss the “Who Dat” controversy surrounding the NFL and its claim to the trademark rights in the words “Who Dat,” part of a cheer started by New Orleans Saints’ fans. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 10:12 pm
This Sunday is, of course, the Super Bowl, and while most everyone seems to be picking the Colts to win (led New Orleans native Peyton Manning; we both attended Isidore Newman School in New Orleans, although he was seven years behind me and he is somewhat better at football than I am), the City of New Orleans and members of the "Who Dat Nation" around the world are hoping for something that not that long ago seemed truly impossible, the Saints winning a Super Bowl. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 11:21 am
Judge Michael Bagneris said “The court recognizes that this pilgrimage enhances the chance of the Who Dat Nation to acquire the long sought after Holy Grail – the Vince Lombardi trophy. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 8:44 am
From NBC New York via USA Today: On Tuesday [Feb. 2] night, the NFL appeared to bow to pressure by admitting, in writing, it did not have exclusive rights to the "Who Dat" phrase, fleur-de-lis symbol or the Saints black and gold team colors.See alsohttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2010/01/coming-trademark-fight-over-who-dat.html [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 7:24 am
Times, Lowering the Bar] "NFL Concedes In Who Dat Battle" [Lowering the Bar, more, earlier; here's a protest t-shirt, and more on those] Some plaintiff's lawyers give their side of the story, disputing fraud allegations in Dole banana-worker pesticide cases [Bronstad, NLJ, earlier] "Google Blog Bundle - 42 criminal defense blogs" [Mark Bennett] And while you're at it, why not take a moment right now to put Overlawyered in your RSS blog reader? [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 6:44 am
A controversy is brewing over the ownership of the phrase "Who Dat? [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:33 pm
The NFL initially said that its trademark registration of “Who Dat? [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 3:03 pm
What Dat you say; Who Dat you ask? [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 8:42 am
So enjoy the game. 2: Who Dat Nation 1, NFL 0 in Merchandise Fight Next up, in an update to a story reported last week,the NFL has backed off its claims over the term “Who Dat”, a popular chant for Saints fans. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:00 am
On Monday, the NFL backed down and said that it would not object to shirts or other gear that were not presented as official Saints or NFL products, even if they use the team colors, the fleur-de-lis or the phrase "Who Dat. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:41 am
One of the teams, the NFC champion New Orleans Saints, are in a dispute over their famed "Who Dat" chant. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
"Who Dat Nation deserves better," said Sen. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 4:58 am
., as well as "Who Dat? [read post]
