Search for: "DAVID v STATE FUND" Results 681 - 700 of 2,178
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2012, 1:42 pm by WIMS
If the Department does not, the court stated that they have the authority to suspend the payments into the Fund. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
Howard Wasserman has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 3:00 am by Christopher Tyner
Supreme Court, yesterday the Court decided in Ramirez v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:09 am by David S. Kemp
The Facts and Arguments of United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Haynes and Boone, LLP Partners Dan Gold, Kit Addleman, Thad Behrens, Emily Westridge Black, Carrie Huff, Tim Newman, David Siegal, and Odean Volker take a look at the important securities litigation developments during 2017. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
While the states were seen as “laboratories of democracy” by Justice Brandeis in New State Ice Company v Liebmann – in recent years states have become “laboratories of national partisan politics,” to adopt Jessica Bulman-Pozen’s gloss on Brandeis. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Defendant also argues that his 360-month sentence of incarceration is unreasonable in light of United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
For minors in Texas, their only option for contraceptive care without parental consent is through federally funded Title X clinics, which are required under federal law to serve women regardless of age; the federal law overrides state parental consent laws in this context. [read post]