Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 681 - 700
of 44,296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2023, 5:30 am
This phrase does not refer to elected officials. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:54 am
Here is the opinion in United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 11:06 pm
United States District Court Judge Stephen V. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:07 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 8:37 am
This is the third post on equity in the United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2015). [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
In a ruling by a magistrate judge, the United States District Court for the District of Maine has concluded that MetLife v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:41 pm
The dissent exposes numerous flaws in the rationale of the plurality opinion, and does so with logic and style. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
In Arizona v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:54 am
See State v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
Trump v. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 12:24 pm
AT&T Corp., 550 U.S. 437 (2007),“[t]he presumption that United States law governs do-mestically but does not rule the world applies with par-ticular force in patent law. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 8:45 am
The Law Under Review In the 2013 ruling of Missouri v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
United States, the United States Supreme Court recently held that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury, not a judge, to make factual findings that raise the mandatory minimum sentence for an offense. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:02 pm
Supreme Court Decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 3:07 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 4:37 pm
Introduction In a case with several important echoes to Canadian appellate law, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has revived the actor’s Hayden Christensen’s “idea theft” lawsuit against the USA Network this week in the Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 1:36 am
On 15 December 2020, the Supreme Court heard the parties’ submissions in the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Limited v State of Libya. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 10:24 am
The text of the ATS does indeed grant the United States jurisdiction for certain international law violations, but it does not explicitly state that this is the case for conduct on foreign soil. [read post]
