Search for: "David Cole" Results 681 - 700 of 1,175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2020, 4:01 am by SHG
As David Cole notes, and it’s a point of utmost seriousness, the legitimacy of the Least Dangerous Branch is always at stake. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:56 am
 It was expressed most forcefully by two of the great common law judges then on the bench, Learned Hand and Jerome Frank; in a case involving a musical composition infringement claim (Arnstein v [Cole] Porter], Judge Frank (joined by Hand) wrote: The proper criterion on [the infringement] issue is not an analytic or other comparison of the respective musical compositions as they appear on paper or in the judgment of trained musicians. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 9:00 pm
"  One of the panel members -- I think it was David Cole or Jonathan Turley -- said that the Bush II administration's anti-terrorism campaign includes efforts to chill SUSPECTED terrorists. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 5:21 pm by Gene Quinn
Joseph Allen Gerald Barnett Andrew Beckerman-Rodau Richard Belzer Merritt Blakeslee David Boundy Dmitry Brant Andrew Cole Robert C. [read post]
18 May 2020, 3:03 pm by Stewart Baker
[Episode 316 of the Cyberlaw Podcast] Our interview guest, Peter Singer, continues to write (with August Cole) what he calls "useful fiction" – thrillers that explore the real-world implications of emerging technologies. [read post]
14 May 2014, 1:55 pm
Judge Cole’s opinion demonstrates (1) that despite decades of jurisprudence permitting state university affirmative action preferences only if used for “diversity” purposes, its legal advocates, including federal judges, still act under the assumption that the purpose of preferences is to benefit students who are members of underrepresented minority groups; (2) some affirmative action advocates cling to an obsolete model of American politics that posits that African… [read post]
7 May 2021, 5:55 am
Cole, Sidley Austin LLP, on Thursday, May 6, 2021 Tags: Boards of Directors, Corporate culture, ESG, Management, Political spending, Public perception, Reputation Reform of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Posted by Lynn E. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 11:34 pm
Cole was struck once in the chest and once in the arm. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
t=carry-the-freighthttps://www.overthemonster.com/2021/10/2/22706405/boston-red-sox-washington-nationals-score-christian-vazquez-enrique-hernandez-hansel-robles * Red Sox 7, Nationals 5: Rafael Devers Sends The Sox To The Postseason… [read post]
16 May 2011, 7:44 am by Steve Hall
David Dewhurst and House Speaker Joe Straus need to intervene to move along four vital bills. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:57 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
David Cole, who argued the case challenging the statute before the Supreme Court, suggested that the Court used “the same sort of deferential approach that the Supreme Court took to anti-Communist laws in the early days of the McCarthy era. [read post]
2 Nov 2013, 4:28 am by Nick Basciano
 Orin stepped back to consider the argument of Just Security’s David Cole, who suggested that law should protect the privacy of all individuals, not just Americans. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 5:45 am by Dan Filler
Colorado (Dean David Getches serving until summer 2011) (Search committee here) (Gregory Hicks, Lawrence Mitchell, Margaret Raymond, and Philip Weiser finalists) Dayton (Dean Lisa Kloppenberg serving until summer 2011) ( Paul McGreal named dean.) [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:57 am by D. Daxton White
Pyka, the sum of $37,000.00 in compensatory damages 11-03704 Eugene Opatz and Ruth Opatz David Alan Theis Respondent David Alan Theis, is liable for and shall pay to Claimant, Eugene Opatz, the sum of $222,135.30 in compensatory damages; Respondent David Alan Theis, is liable for and shall pay to Claimant Eugene Opatz the sum of $250,000.00 in punitive damages; Respondent David Alan Theis, is liable for and shall pay to Claimant, Eugene Opatz, attorneys fees in… [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 12:50 pm
Chairman Battista, dissenting in part, does not agree that the General Counsel has shown a violation as to Cook and Cole because the evidence does not establish that the Respondent knew that Cook and Cole were union adherents. [read post]