Search for: "Doe 35"
Results 681 - 700
of 17,233
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2009, 10:24 pm
Therefore, on this record, we conclude that the outline of the two generic bottle shapes shown in the drawing does not create a separate and distinct commercial impression.And so the Board further concluded that the alleged mark "is not a substantially exact representation of the mark as show in applicant's specimen," and it affirmed the refusal.TTABlog comment: If these mutilation cases are so subjective, why make this one precedential? [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:45 am
Under current policy, there are six taxable income brackets – 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, and 35%. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 5:10 am
What does the Clinton camp know? [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:46 pm
What, pray tell, does Mayo Collaborative Services change with regard to that ruling in the original AMP decision? [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 7:45 pm
" 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:46 pm
A fine trailer that does a fine job of avoiding spoilers. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 7:01 am
Therefore, the status of the reexamination does not provide a basis to dismiss any portion of this case. . . . [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 6:59 am
Following judgment on the pleadings of unpatentable subject matter, the court denied defendants' motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:00 am
REMEMBER: If a party does not withdraw their excessive specially prepared interrogatories or requests for admissions, you must file a protective order as an objection is not sufficient if a declaration of necessity is attached. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 11:00 am
REMEMBER: If a party does not withdraw their excessive specially prepared interrogatories or requests for admissions, you must file a protective order as an objection is not sufficient if a declaration of necessity is attached. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:01 am
Background Hummel Holding A/S (‘Hummel’) owns International Registration no. 915962 designating the EU for the following figurative mark: It was registered for the EU in 2006 for various goods and services in classes 3, 18, 25, 28, and 35. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 12:48 pm
See 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:10 am
As such, the Hague Convention does not apply to the above facts. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
It refers to the Patent Office's Licensing and Review function, which is an early screening function applicable to all provisional applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(b), nonprovisional applications filed under 35 U.S.C. 111(a), and international applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 10:00 pm
However, it does not appear as if the USPTO is quite out of the woods yet. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:00 am
This gives her a base of between 35% and 40% of the party. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:00 am
§ 101 rather than a plant patent under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 2:43 pm
Click here for today’s daily dose of dumb and then answer the following question: What valuable HR lessons does this video teach? [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 1:58 am
This situation does not exist here, nor does Orbis argue that it does.link: http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/images/stories/opinions-orders/14-1711.Opinion.6-30-2015.1.PDF [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
Maybe you think you’re innocent and the truth will set you free, but it almost never does. [read post]
