Search for: "Does 1 - 175" Results 681 - 700 of 1,048
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2010, 6:12 am by @ErikJHeels
Separation Of Powers – Who Does What In The US Government II. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
A declaration does not have the effect of making primary legislation invalid. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
Doody, 11-175 (both from the Ninth Circuit, the latter case en banc), and Hardy v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:07 pm by Schachtman
Kan. 2003) (Rule  26(a)(2) “does not require that a report recite each minute fact or piece of scientific information that might be elicited on direct examination to establish the admissibility of the expert opinion … Nor does it require the expert to anticipate every criticism and articulate every nano-detail that might be involved in defending the opinion[.] [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:01 am by Emily Eslinger, Michel Paradis
This is easily seen by the fact that the UCMJ does not apply to you in Title 32 status. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
Tatham, 14 How. 156, 174- 175 (1853). [read post]
The ILO Code of Practice concerning the protection of workers’ personal data was drafted to this end and adopted by a Meeting of Experts on Workers’ Privacy of the ILO in 1996.[9] It has not been adopted as an ILO Convention or a Recommendation and does not have binding force, but it should be used in the development of legislation, regulations, collective bargaining agreements, work regulations, policies and other practical measures. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 2:57 pm by Richard Altieri, Benjamin Della Rocca
’s lead, France enacted a de facto phase-out of Huawei’s products (although it does not describe its policy as a ban). [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm by Patricia Hughes
Rather, its powers derive from sections 60(2)(c) and (d) and 63(1) and 63(4) of the Judges Act (it is constituted under section 59 of the Judges Act). [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:21 am by Susan Brenner
 It does not say if anything was awarded against Reed. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 7:26 am by Cyberleagle
(C-623/17 [65], C-511/18 [175]) (citing Schrems 2, [175]) -         General access to all retained data (including by general and indiscriminate transmission), regardless of whether there is any link, at least indirect, with the aim pursued, cannot be regarded as strictly necessary. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 3:22 pm by Stephen Page
Nor does the family consultant make “findings” in the sense that the term is applied to judicial determinations. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 12:50 am by Kevin LaCroix
” He added that if an agent of the insurer becomes aware of a claim “but the agent does not work in the Claims Department and does not notify the Claims Department of the claim, then there has not been substantial compliance with the ‘to whom’ requirement. [read post]