Search for: "Does 1 - 57"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2019, 6:41 pm
The present guiding principles distil over two years of research and collective and participatory work with a dedicated focus on the human rights impacts of economic reforms on the human rights of millions of people around the globe and lessons learned over decades.1 2. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 6:09 am
Quall, 471 F.Supp.2d 1053, 1056-57 (C.D. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
L.J. 57 (2019). 4. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 11:23 pm
Since Szymuszkiewicz had not cited any cases holding that using two computers to intercept communications does not satisfy the requirements of § 2511(1)(a), the judge held that the government had carried its burden of proving the "use of device" element of the § 2511(1)(a) charges. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
In his statement dissenting from the Proposed Rule, Vice Chairman Travis Hill summarized the likely practical procedural effect of these changes: “Given (1) the number of deposit arrangements that may be newly scoped in by the rule, (2) the more subjective standard by which the FDIC will judge applications, and (3) the lack of grandfathering of existing arrangements, I suspect an enormous avalanche of applications may hit the FDIC on day 1, which the agency is completely… [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
Code § 2341(1)]. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 3:41 am
The referred question was: Does the embedding of a work – which is available on a freely accessible website with the consent of the rightholder – in the website of a third party by way of framing constitute communication to the public of that work within the meaning of Article 3(1) of [the InfoSoc] Directive 2001/29/EC where it occurs through circumvention of protection measures against framing taken or instigated by the rightholder? [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:50 am
Only under special circumstances does Article V(1)(e) NYC not prevent the court from using the margin of discretion to recognise or grant enforcement of annulled foreign arbitral awards. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Guerinot, 57 A.D.2d 73 (N.Y. [read post]
6 Jul 2006, 2:08 am
It does not appear to be as bad, on its face, as those decisions. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 3:50 pm
., here: WTF does that mean?! [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
[2.1] [… C]laim 1 [of the main request] was amended in comparison to claim 1 [as granted]. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 10:50 am
Op. at ¶ 57. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 5:41 am
First, consider the report’s treatment of warnings, one of the precautions set out in Article 57 of Additional Protocol I. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 9:39 am
While the French law defines at length what "injures" means, it does not define "offense." [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 6:04 pm
China in Africa: Essays 1. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:39 pm
§ 1295(a)(1). [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 3:23 am
See In re Boyd Gaming Corp., 57 U.S.P.Q.2d 1944, 1947 (T.T.A.B. 2000).Marks found to be primarily geographically descriptively misdescriptive under Section 2(e)(3):TTAB Sustains Section 2(e)(3) Opposition to HAVANA COLLECTION for Cigar AccessoriesPrecedential No. 24: TTAB Affirms Refusal of REAL RUSSIAN as Primarily Geographically Deceptively Misdescriptive of VodkaPrecedential No. 15: TTAB Affirms Section 2(e)(3) Refusal of OLD HAVANA as Primarily Geographically Deceptively… [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:25 pm
Oral Arg. at 6:28–57, http://oralarguments.cafc.uscourts.gov/default.aspx? [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 6:37 pm
The Act, however, does not assist in determining who, in these circumstances, should exercise that control [read post]
