Search for: "Does 1 - 57" Results 681 - 700 of 3,097
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2021, 6:26 am by Tobias Lutzi
Upon a first reading of the decision, four aspects may be noted: (1) The Court appears to have followed the AG’s proposition to adopt “a narrow and minimalist approach [to] this case” (Opinion, para 43). [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 10:20 am by Ashoka Mukpo
Cowlitz’s contract had been signed in 2011, with the county agreeing to jail minors who had been classified as “List 1” by ICE — those the agency considered exempt from the Flores settlement’s stricter requirements. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 2:33 am by Patricia Hughes
For ease of identification throughout the post, I’m listing them here: 1. [read post]
31 May 2021, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
” (Impact Assessment [166]) Additional moderation costs are expected to be incurred in greater proportion by the largest (Category 1) providers: 7.5% of revenue for Category 1 organisations and 1.9% for all other in-scope organisations (Impact Assessment [180]). [read post]
31 May 2021, 6:47 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Where the defendant is resident in a foreign country and does not submit to the jurisdiction of the Nigerian court, then leave of court is required in accordance with the relevant civil procedure rules to bring a foreign defendant before the Nigerian Court. [read post]
30 May 2021, 8:57 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
… [57] Articles 11 and 108 C.C.P. [read post]
16 May 2021, 5:39 pm by Russell Knight
” In re Estate of Longeway, 133 Ill. 2d 33, 57 (Ill. 1989) This right to refuse treatment is not absolute. [read post]
16 May 2021, 5:10 am by Cyberleagle
” (Impact Assessment [166]) Additional moderation costs are expected to be incurred in greater proportion by the largest (Category 1) providers: 7.5% of revenue for Category 1 organisations and 1.9% for all other in-scope organisations (Impact Assessment [180]). [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
” Residents of a Contracting Party are clearly within the “jurisdiction” of that Contracting Party for purposes of Article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:09 pm by Shea Denning
The Court of Appeals found no error. (1) The Highway Patrol trooper who arrested the defendant testified about his training in the administration of the horizontal gaze nystagmus test (HGN) for the detection of impairment and the interpretation of the results on the test. [read post]