Search for: "Does 1 through 12" Results 681 - 700 of 15,567
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2023, 12:00 pm by Unknown
The OA items herein were previously referenced on this blog as of 1 April 2023. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 7:06 am by Barbara Bavis
If the person was buried as a consequence of this state of lethargy, the attempt will be considered a murder.[1] How does this provision relate to the creatures we think of today as “zombies”? [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 9:24 am
§274a.12(b)(20), a person lawfully employed under A-3, E-1,E-2,E-3,G-5, H-1B, H-2A/B, H-3, I, J-1, L-1, O-1/O-2, P-1/P-2/P-3, R or TN status who timely files an application for extension consistent with 8 C.F.R. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
However, Fontem had muddied the concepts of anticipation (does the prior document disclose something which falls within the claim) with priority (does the prior document support the claims across their whole width), and Mr Baldwin agreed that the priority document did not support the full breadth of the granted ‘349 claims, and therefore not entitled to claim priority.Having met all three conditions, the ‘349 patent was considered anticipated by ‘350.In addition,… [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 7:28 am
Commonwealth, issued on February 29, 2008, and effectively reversed itself in a new opinion issued on September 12, 2008. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 12:00 pm by Unknown
Blog posts & press:"Refugee resettlement numbers yet to recover amid pandemic," UN News, 5 Aug. 2021 [text]Workshop on National Durable Solutions Strategy and Action Plan for South Sudan Initiative concludes in South Sudan (UNHCR, July 2021) [text]Reports & journal articles:"Beyond integration: football as a mobile, transnational sphere of belonging for refugee-background young people," Leisure Studies, Latest Articles, 12 Aug. 2021 [open access]- Studies were… [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:06 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The OD rejected the application based on Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR (lack of distinctiveness). [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Therefore, your communication with us through this forum will not be considered as privileged or confidential. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:01 am by Eric
July 20, 2010): "the anti-SLAPP statute's public-participation requirement does not exclude speech communicated through the medium of the Internet. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 3:30 pm by Jon L. Gelman
—For purposes of this section, in the case of a taxpayer who has received, or has been approved to receive, unemployment compensation for any week beginning during 2021, for the taxable year in which such week begins— “(A) such taxpayer shall be treated as an applicable taxpayer, and “(B) there shall not be taken into account any household income of the taxpayer in excess of 133 percent of the poverty line for a family of the size involved.American Rescue Plan Act of 2021PL… [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:47 am
The amendment only addresses the sentencing stage of a trial and does not change the guilt or innocence phase of a verdict. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 3:52 am
All of the hearings except one (1) will be held in the East Wing of the Madison Building, in Alexandria, Virginia. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 through 15 years of age and for administering a third dose in certain immunocompromised individuals. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:37 am
 These are the 7 questions that in the AG’s opinion the Dutch Supreme Court should refer to the CJEU:1Does it constitute a “communication to the public” in the sense of Art 3(1) of Directive 2001/29, when a person -who is not the copyright holder- makes available a work -which was placed without the consent of the copyright holder by a third person an a website- on his own website through a hyperlink (in other words: in the case… [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 2:00 pm by Robert Liles
Justice Manual, § 1-19.000 – Limitation on Issuance of Guidance Documents: As § 1-19.000 of the Justice Manual provides, when issuing non-binding guidance documents, DOJ components should expressly identify the documents as guidance that does not carry the force or effect of law. [read post]