Search for: "Does 1 to 10, inclusive" Results 681 - 700 of 2,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2009, 10:08 pm
For example, physicians owning 10% of an LTACH on January 1, 2009 could not increase their ownership or investment interest above 10%. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 7:28 am by Jessica Kroeze
The publication of priority application EP 1 834 951 A (D1) was among the documents cited during opposition proceedings.The opposition division came to inter alia the following conclusions on the then pending main request:- The claimed subject-matter partially enjoyed the priority date of 10 March 2006 from D1.- D1 was thus not a conflicting application and could not be used against the novelty of the claimed subject-matter.- The claimed subject-matter was novel and involved an… [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 8:33 am
GAO extensively reviewed scientific studies, interviewed experts and agency officials, and visited five DOE and USDA laboratories. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 3:36 am
On November 1, 2007, thisCourt affirmed the denial of all relief. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 4:49 am by Unknown
(AF 10).ARGUMENTOn August 4, 2011, the Employer requested reconsideration. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 2:31 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Inclusion of a dual-criminality clause rather than a list of offenses covered by the Treaty obviates the need to renegotiate or supplement the Treaty as offenses become punishable under the laws of both Parties. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 8:47 am by Greta Ravitsky and Mason Gardner
Notwithstanding the September 1 effective date, pending litigation may impede the Act’s implementation. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:53 am by Parveen Karsan
Paragraph 12(1)(g) of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the “Act”) requires an inclusion in income from a business or property of “any amount received by the taxpayer in the year that was dependent on the use of or production from property whether or not that amount was an installment of the sale price of the property…” Any earn-out amounts received would, therefore, technically be required to be included in the vendor’s income pursuant to paragraph… [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 3:54 am by Administrator
How were these offences selected and what is the basis for their inclusion? [read post]
2 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In terms of any divergence compared to the first auxiliary request, at least in as far as claim 11 is concerned, this is rather academic since claim 11 was the same in the main request and auxiliary request 1. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Kari D. Boyle
Demonstrate leadership by walking the talk The leader: [Note 3] Models behaviours that invite / welcome contrary views Examines ideas with curiosity and without judgment Shows understanding and refrains from blaming Is willing to admit when he/she is wrong Is willing to take personal risks In inclusive in decision-making Does not use favoritism – or create “in” and “out” team members Does not tolerate abusive, controlling or harassing… [read post]