Search for: "Duck v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 811
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2019, 4:02 am
Take the case of Hutto v. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
And after Brown v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
In Monroe v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm
The most obvious historical analogy — the Court’s disgraceful and widely condemned decision to duck the issue of interracial marriage when it first presented itself in Naim v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 11:41 pm
There'll be a spectacular Epic Games v. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The district court dismissed these claims stating that the alleged taking had not sought compensation in the earlier state court proceedings as required by Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:40 pm
On Monday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down its Continental v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
* Two of President Bush's lame-duck pardons were Long Island real estate developers convicted of fraud. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:24 am
An excellent example of this trend can be found in the Wisconsin case of State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:17 am
The answer has recently been summarised in Viceroy Cayman Limited v Anthony Otto Syrowatka [2021] ATMO 159 (Viceroy v Syrowatka), stating “[i]t is well established that ownership of a trade mark is established either by authorship and prior use, or by the combination of authorship, the filing of the application and an intention to use or authorise use”. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
United States, 333 US 46 (1948), the United States Supreme Court ruled that res ipsa loquitur applied in Jesionowski v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:20 am
This comes from Pearson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:01 am
Murder case on Tinder, which was v. helpful. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:05 pm
Sweeney v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 12:03 pm
This argument has the outgoing (lame duck) president signing an executive order allowing medical marijuana in all 50 states while he still has the presidential pen. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
Of the justices now on the Court, Samuel Alito seems the most likely to find merit in legal protection for animals, based on his solo dissent in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
