Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE"
Results 681 - 700
of 3,657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
The problem, stated at its most general, is simple. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:30 am
In Orsatti v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
The complaints relate to allegations about Mr Topić’s previous job as Director General of the State Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am
On 16 March 2022, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 10:07 am
The first petition of the day is: Title: The Clearing House Ass’n, L.L.C. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 2:13 am
Co. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 7:31 am
The identification principle requires a prosecutor to demonstrate that a company’s culpable state of mind is established through the actions and intentions of an individual who embodies the directing mind and will of that company. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 2:09 am
However, “materials published by Vedanta state that its ultimate control of KCM is not thereby to be regarded as any less than it would be if wholly owned”. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 12:31 pm
Wrote the European Court of Human Rights in Case of A, B, and C v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:11 pm
Summary dismissal of a suit charging discrimination based on sex and religion for failure to state a claim.Village of Bensenville v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 11:29 am
State, 154 Tenn. 105, 289 S.W. 363 (1927); Genesis 1:1-2:9. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 2:35 pm
R (o.t.a A and B) v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 2:42 pm
The existence of last week's ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury MR, Jacob LJ and Richards LJ) in Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited v Eli Lilly and Company Limited [2009] EWCA Civ 1362 has already been noted on this weblog, but not much has been said about its substance. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 4:05 pm
The first was a straightforward Jameel v Dow Jones & Co. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:22 am
Carter v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The claimant argued that, under the 2003 Regulations, the law of England and Wales was applicable, or alternatively that if Rome II did apply then on the proper interpretation of Art 4 the applicable law was that of England and Wales.Mr Justice Owen held that Rome II did apply to determine the applicable law. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The claimant argued that, under the 2003 Regulations, the law of England and Wales was applicable, or alternatively that if Rome II did apply then on the proper interpretation of Art 4 the applicable law was that of England and Wales.Mr Justice Owen held that Rome II did apply to determine the applicable law. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
Lady Hale interjects in jest, noting he might have to explain the importance of 1966 (when England won the world cup). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
The decision is significant to cross-border insolvencies in relation to the ability to enforce foreign insolvency judgments within England andWales. [read post]
