Search for: "En V Us, LLC"
Results 681 - 700
of 994
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am
Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am
In Schuette v Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v Regents of the University of Michigan (Dkt No 12-682), the Supreme Court will review an en banc Sixth Circuit decision that a voter-approved ban on government affirmative action in the state of Michigan, as it applies to race-conscious admissions policies in public colleges and universities, violated the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:15 am
Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:28 am
Reviewing en banc the appeal of a jury award in favor of a male ironworker who was allegedly sexually harassed by a superintendent because he wasn’t manly enough, the Fifth Circuit, in a 10-6 decision, found sufficient evidence that the harassment was because of the employee’s sex and was sufficiently severe and pervasive to alter his work environment (EEOC v Boh Brothers Construction Co, LLC, September 27, 2013). [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:20 am
., LLC v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:20 am
., LLC v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:25 pm
In Field Hybrids, LLC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 7:08 am
Cir. 2002) (en banc). [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 1:31 pm
Keeping a Pulse on Class and Collective Actions: An Analysis of Recent Supreme Court and Federal Court Decisions Involving FRCP Rule 23 and the FLSA The panel will discuss recent, key decisions involving 1) AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:24 am
SeeHigh Point Design LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
This part of the opinion may seem strange in light of the 2008 en banc decision in Egyptian Goddess, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:55 pm
., GMBH v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:09 pm
MarcTec, LLC v. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 4:15 am
Patent No. 7,582,051 (Heart Failure Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 8:36 am
Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("Festo X"). [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:26 pm
If the panel doesn't agree that the "causal nexus" requirement should apply only to preliminary (pre-trial) and not permanent (post-trial) injunctions, then it may decide to proposal a full-court review of the matter, which would mean a second hearing before a final Federal Circuit ruling comes down.In May the Federal Circuit -- a panel led by the court's Chief Judge Randall Rader -- reversed a denial of a permanent patent injunction in a snowplow case (Douglas Dynamics, LLC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
UMG v. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 8:24 pm
By Dennis Crouch DDR Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 10:22 am
In any event, I thought it might be useful to include some excerpts of some recent cases in the US District Courts, which are the equivalent of Canada’s Federal Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm
Unlike Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]
