Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 681 - 700
of 15,381
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
Because it was a fiscal session, the Louisiana Legislature enacted a number of key tax changes in the 2023 Regular Session that concluded on June 8, 2023. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
” [Figure 2, slip op. at 5] Warhol died three years later at age 58. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
[Justice Gorsuch v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:41 am
Some additional implications: * any rules have to assume that political figures will respond to public criticism with a thin-skin and retaliatory intent. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
It was famously rejected in McCulloch v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
’”[14] While declining to apply the Rogers test, the Court noted that “a trademark’s expressive message — particularly a parodic one, as VIP asserts – may properly figure in assessing the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
’”[14] While declining to apply the Rogers test, the Court noted that “a trademark’s expressive message — particularly a parodic one, as VIP asserts – may properly figure in assessing the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
’”[14] While declining to apply the Rogers test, the Court noted that “a trademark’s expressive message — particularly a parodic one, as VIP asserts – may properly figure in assessing the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
While figures like Sen. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:02 pm
Such is the case with Nature’s Touch Frozen Foods v. [read post]
Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A. // Protecting Privacy and Privilege Rights in Non-Party Requests for Documents
15 Jun 2023, 12:01 pm
Lyons v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:52 am
The Supreme Court stated that “a trademark’s expressive message—particularly a parodic one, as VIP asserts—may properly figure in assessing the likelihood of confusion. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:03 am
From Tucson v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Other states would presumably respond and try to figure out the best way to alleviate the problem through some kind of collective action. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
And these are just the possibly sympathetic figures: For others, see the Bible's account of Judas, or any book noting the deaths of Hitler, Himmler, Goering, or Goebbels. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
First, FTC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:55 am
Yesterday, the UCLA Environmental Law Clinic filed a brief in the California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:27 am
From Judge Garcia's majority opinion in Gottwald v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
From Pinnacle Bancorp, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 3:36 am
As regards how that figure was derived, first the Judge used the unpacked rates from each of the Apple comparables to derive an implied value of the Stack in each case. [read post]
