Search for: "Fisher v. Major"
Results 681 - 700
of 801
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 1:21 pm
Army Corps of Engineers in 2001 and Rapanos v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:00 am
Pinsky, Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe, New York Secretary of State Lorraine Cortés-Vázquez, Metropolitan Waterfront Alliance President and CEO Roland Lewis, and an array of New York City waterfront advocates. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:56 pm
I highly recommend Major Daniel Froehlich’s article, The Impact of Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 10:29 am
But the petition for rehearing clearly changed Judge Fisher's mind, since a couple of months ago, he withdrew his opinion, and today, Judge Noonan -- who was the author of the original dissent -- writes the majority opinion, which affirms the tax court. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 8:30 am
Hilliard and Royals v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
” Jeffrey Fisher, who clerked for Stevens in the 1998-99 term and is now a professor at Stanford, says, “The reason he very rarely speaks first is that he really listens to his colleagues and tries to figure out what is on their minds and tries to figure out what the swing votes care about in the case. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:26 pm
Judge O’Malley wrote an interesting dissent while sitting by designation in Ormco Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 1:04 pm
But a majority of the Supreme Court has a narrower view of effective assistance of counsel than the Ninth Circuit majority seemed to employ, as demonstrated in a summary reversal earlier this term in Bobby v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
" Justice Austin's Majority Opinion Ocean Suffolk appealed the order of dissolution to the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(GRAY On Claims) District Court E D Louisiana: Prior License of asserted patent does not bar imposition of permanent injunction: Innovention Toys, LLC v MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Delay of five to seven years does not create undue prejudice sufficient to deny stay pending reexam: Spectros Corp v Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc (Docket Report) BPAI: Reissue cannot merely add new dependent claims (without cancelling the broader… [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:06 am
Yet majority opinion has long felt that this particular point is no obstacle to the likes of Google (or Facebook, or Hotmail?) [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:18 am
(Her predecessor David Souter was in the majority.) [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
Fisher, 2009 WL 2462563 (Pa. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:19 am
In Michigan v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Fisher back in 1872. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am
This issue, as well, was a major bone of contention in the ALI's consideration of the Principles of Aggregate litigation. [read post]
