Search for: "Hopkins v. State"
Results 681 - 700
of 810
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2009, 4:36 pm
V. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 2:03 pm
In a 2012 case called United States v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 6:25 am
On Tuesday, Wells linked to an en banc decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 9:01 pm
Hopkins (1989), the Supreme Court ruled that reliance on sex-role stereotyping can be an actionable form of employment discrimination. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:39 pm
Supreme Court ruled, in Price Waterhouse v Hopkins (49 EPD ¶38,936), that discrimination based on gender stereotyping (i.e. failing to act and appear according to expectations defined by gender) could constitute a violation of Title VII. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 9:01 pm
It started with the seminal 1989 Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:37 am
Hopkins, 490 U. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
(Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
United States, 137 U. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
Hopkins. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 6:07 am
The verdict in Sterns v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 7:03 am
When the matter reconvened in April 2006, Soule, who had relocated with the child out of state, appeared via telephone. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 8:35 pm
In that case, EEOC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:06 am
Originally posted at InjuryBoard by John Hopkins [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s 1992 decision in Franklin v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 7:55 pm
This finding was the crucial one in distinguishing it from the previous seminal case in privacy class actions, in Hopkins v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 12:56 pm
Hopkins. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
Pinkney v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am
Although the DAC stated that it did not object to the petition, it did not recommend the proposals for approval by the Court. [read post]
