Search for: "In Re Adoption of G."
Results 681 - 700
of 1,650
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Federal Circuit: TC Heartland changed the law; pre-decision waiver of venue challenges are nullified
15 Nov 2017, 1:11 pm
by Dennis Crouch In re Micron (Fed. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 11:00 pm
Building on its recent decision in In re Petrobras Securities Litigation,[9] the Second Circuit held that a plaintiff need not always offer direct event study evidence of a cause-and-effect relationship between new information and stock price movements before satisfying its burden to prove market efficiency at the class certification stage. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Andrew G. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Andrew G. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Canada (Procureur général), (C.S. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:30 am
De plus, la Cour fédérale a noté que les décisions partagées décourageraient l’adoption de pratiques inefficaces. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:30 am
De plus, la Cour fédérale a noté que les décisions partagées décourageraient l’adoption de pratiques inefficaces. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:09 pm
And although we are quite adept at interpreting and applying these rules in creative fashions, we’re not always that great at following rules when we’re required to do so. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 8:24 am
How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT,” 154 Envt’l Res. 452 (2017) [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
The County of Santa Cruz, as part of its plan to overhaul its zoning ordinance, adopted three separate ordinance amendments to: (1) expand the minor exceptions to the zoning site standards; (2) alter the height, density, and parking requirements for hotels in its commercial districts; and (3) adopted an administrative approval process for some minor exceptions to the sign ordinance. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 3:44 am
And what you’re going to say. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:01 am
The writer explained, “We’re dealing with a lot of subsections in 280. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:50 am
The Jewish name begins with a “G. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
I adopt Transworld's recommendation, grant Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 207), and AWARD Plaintiff $4,900 in total fees and costs.SO ORDERED.EARLIER OPINION ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS BY OTHER DEFENDANTS JANE C. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 9:27 am
Judges should be encouraged to consider counsel fees under Rule 12:235-3.6(g) when frivolous motions are filed.9. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Intitulé : Procureure générale du Canada c. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm
Supreme Court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeal and re-instated the decision of the trial judge. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Forward-Looking Statements: Does “We’re on Track” Qualify? [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 11:30 am
As Venkat suggests, maybe this is a net win for our community, as companies adopt more “judge-proof” implementations that leave no room for doubt. [read post]
