Search for: "In Re Adoption of Rule"
Results 681 - 700
of 13,465
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2011, 7:17 pm
That exemption expires when the FCC adopts formal small business exemption rules pursuant to further rulemaking proceedings, or Oct. 8, 2013, which is earlier.] [read post]
3 May 2008, 4:01 pm
The whole case, In re Z.L., No. 4-06-0998 (2/15/08), is available by clicking here. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 6:36 am
After a lengthy legal challenge to the last set of such rules (adopted in 2010), the D.C. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:49 am
On 8 December 2011, Julian Adams, Director of Insurance at the Financial Services Authority (FSA), explained in a speech to the Association of British Insurers how UK (re)insurance companies may be permitted to start their Solvency II implementation as initially scheduled on 1 January 2013 rather than on the delayed implementation date of 1 January 2014.The FSA has previously made clear that its current rules, the Individual Capital Adequacy Standards (ICAS), will remain in force… [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 7:40 am
Under a consent agreement (i.e., settlement), Bauer has also agreed to remove or modify the challenged claims and adopt an enhanced corporate compliance program. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Uyeda, who voted against the Amendments, expressed their disapproval of several aspects of the Amendments, including the mandatory liquidity fee framework, and suggested that the framework should have been re-proposed for additional public comment. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Uyeda, who voted against the Amendments, expressed their disapproval of several aspects of the Amendments, including the mandatory liquidity fee framework, and suggested that the framework should have been re-proposed for additional public comment. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 4:50 am
" Last week, the SEC delegated authority to its Chief Accountant to propose and adopt rules from the PCAOB - among other things - in an effort to streamline the process [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 9:45 am
"Without a rule, no one knows if we're protecting the lake. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 6:11 am
’ (NJ RPC 1.10)” “A recent Third Circuit precedential opinion (In re Maxus Energy Corp.) discusses the detailed requirements of that screening process under the ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct (as adopted by the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 3:31 am
One witness undercut the state’s case by saying adoption decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:07 am
If adopted outside the Southern District of California, the ruling could throw the role of MERS into doubt for foreclosures of securitized loans. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:40 pm
S139184 (4/3/08)) the California Supreme Court found the perfect case in which to finally adopt the "sophisticated user defense", something that the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 1:16 pm
They’re outpacing non-Mansfield peers in diversifying law firm leadership — by a factor of 30. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 6:46 am
They’re still under threat of deportation by ICE, but there is no country that will accept them. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 1:27 pm
The Board first issued an almost identical Rule in 2011, but it was invalidated by a federal court because the Board lacked a proper quorum when it had voted to adopt the Rule. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 4:01 am
Res judicata The appellant then raised a variety of arguments against the foreign order having res judicata in France. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:24 am
To a certain degree, we’re constrained to accept the reality that the masses get to dictate the rules to us. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:09 am
‘But they’re hard to enforce.'” “George Cardona, the bar’s chief trial counsel, told the Los Angeles Times last month that he thought adoption of a mandatory reporting rule might help restore public confidence in the state bar. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) A profile by Seth Stern:Most constitutional scholars initially ridiculed [Randy] Barnett’s argument against the individual mandate — that Congress cannot regulate or punish the “inactivity” of not buying something.Few mock it anymore, now that two courts have adopted the same reasoning in ruling against the individual mandate’s constitutionality. [read post]
